U2-3D vs Milan

U2girl · 02-17-2008, 07:22 AM

Leaving aside the 3-D effects, which of these was the better Vertigo tour document and who is the better U2 director ? Hamilton or Owens/Pellington ?

perrypickwick · 02-17-2008, 10:04 AM

I don't have to see the 3D film to answer this question

Jdelbove · 02-21-2008, 11:00 AM

i dont know why everyone loves milan sure great outdoor stage and nice atmospher but Bono's voice is tired and rough throughout the show and that alone ruins it for me. Sure U23D is way better hey Bono sounds good even the Chicago show is better

Reggie Thee Dog · 02-21-2008, 11:03 AM

U23D...by a longshot...

edurban · 02-21-2008, 11:49 AM

U2 3D is not a concert, sorry, it's a mixed up film, it can't be compared.

Rosebud · 02-21-2008, 02:29 PM

I agree edurban. I really enjoyed U23D, but it's really not the same as a complete concert film, with all the great in-between-songs action, etc. Maybe better for a general audience, but isn't the same type of film.

pepokiss · 02-21-2008, 03:06 PM

mmm

Hamish or ANYONE ELSE...

hard choice

Canadiens1131 · 02-21-2008, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pepokiss
mmm

Hamish or ANYONE ELSE...

hard choice

QFTMF

perrypickwick · 02-21-2008, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by edurban
U2 3D is not a concert, sorry, it's a mixed up film, it can't be compared.

that's what Hamilton also does. Chicago is cutted from three of four shows. Also cuts from different days in one shot. That's not such a big problem for me if it's well done (somtime sadly it isn't) BUT

Hamilton is just a horrible director for U2. But we had this topic already...

02-17-2008, 07:22 AM	#1
U2girl Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: slovenija Posts: 21,099 Local Time: 12:03 AM	U2-3D vs Milan Leaving aside the 3-D effects, which of these was the better Vertigo tour document and who is the better U2 director ? Hamilton or Owens/Pellington ? __________________

02-17-2008, 10:04 AM	#2
perrypickwick Acrobat Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Germany Posts: 374 Local Time: 10:03 PM	I don't have to see the 3D film to answer this question __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-21-2008, 11:00 AM	#3
Jdelbove Acrobat Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: US Posts: 450 Local Time: 10:03 PM	i dont know why everyone loves milan sure great outdoor stage and nice atmospher but Bono's voice is tired and rough throughout the show and that alone ruins it for me. Sure U23D is way better hey Bono sounds good even the Chicago show is better

02-21-2008, 11:03 AM	#4
Reggie Thee Dog Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Hell Ain't A Bad Place To Be... Posts: 17,996 Local Time: 03:03 PM	U23D...by a longshot...

02-21-2008, 11:49 AM	#5
edurban War Child Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: London Posts: 939 Local Time: 10:03 PM	U2 3D is not a concert, sorry, it's a mixed up film, it can't be compared.

02-21-2008, 02:29 PM	#6
Rosebud Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: in the enchanted forest of dreams and wonderment...or else at my computer. Posts: 7,213 Local Time: 03:03 PM	I agree edurban. I really enjoyed U23D, but it's really not the same as a complete concert film, with all the great in-between-songs action, etc. Maybe better for a general audience, but isn't the same type of film.

02-21-2008, 03:06 PM	#7
pepokiss Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Santiago, Chile Posts: 7,984 Local Time: 06:03 PM	mmm Hamish or ANYONE ELSE... hard choice