U2-3D vs Milan

[U2girl]

Leaving aside the 3-D effects, which of these was the better Vertigo tour document and who is the better U2 director ? Hamilton or Owens/Pellington ?

 

[perrypickwick]

I don't have to see the 3D film to answer this question

 

[Jdelbove]

i dont know why everyone loves milan sure great outdoor stage and nice atmospher but Bono's voice is tired and rough throughout the show and that alone ruins it for me. Sure U23D is way better hey Bono sounds good even the Chicago show is better

 

[Reggie Thee Dog]

U23D...by a longshot...

 

[edurban]

U2 3D is not a concert, sorry, it's a mixed up film, it can't be compared.

 

[Rosebud]

I agree edurban. I really enjoyed U23D, but it's really not the same as a complete concert film, with all the great in-between-songs action, etc. Maybe better for a general audience, but isn't the same type of film.

 

[pepokiss]

mmm


Hamish or ANYONE ELSE...





hard choice

 

[Canadiens1131]

mmm


Hamish or ANYONE ELSE...





hard choice

QFTMF

 

[perrypickwick]

U2 3D is not a concert, sorry, it's a mixed up film, it can't be compared.

that's what Hamilton also does. Chicago is cutted from three of four shows. Also cuts from different days in one shot. That's not such a big problem for me if it's well done (somtime sadly it isn't) BUT

Hamilton is just a horrible director for U2. But we had this topic already...