![]() |
#81 | ||
Galeonbroad
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,778
Local Time: 10:54 AM
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just to clarify, your opinion doesn't hurt me in any sense. I respect that you're willing to explain it and discuss views with me. Even though some views aren't quite positive on me, it's still your opinion. And as long as it's put respectfully, it's fine by me. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,096
Local Time: 04:54 AM
|
Because my comment wasn't about something that you would need a study to see. Fertility science has made possible families with all sorts of combinations of genetic relatedness. Many different adults may be involved in the conception of a child, and they may stay involved in the child's life. If we can take my aforementioned example of two sterile straight people conceiving with two donors and a surrogate and have no trouble recognizing that as a legitimate family, why is a same sex couple raising a child that one of them may be genetically related to suddenly not a real family?
__________________What are gay parents doing other than parenting? If their families look and act and function just like families, what makes them something other than families? What makes this model false? An appeal to nature is the argument that because something occurs naturally it is necessarily good or ideal, or that something that does not occur in nature is necessarily bad. "Appeal to nature is a fallacious argument, because the mere "naturalness" of something is unrelated to its positive or negative qualities - natural things can be bad or harmful (such as infant death and the jellyfish on the left), and unnatural things can be good (such as clothes, especially when you are in Siberia). Another problem is the distinction of what is "natural" and what is not, which can be really murky: crude oil occurs naturally, but it's not something you'd like poured on seabirds or your garden. The word "natural" itself has no exact definition and can be used in multiple ways, thus allowing equivocation." Appeal to nature - RationalWiki |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,096
Local Time: 04:54 AM
|
On a different note, I heard Alysia Abbot talk about her book Fairyland on the radio a little while ago. She was raised by her biological father, a gay man, in San Francisco in the 1970s and she was really interesting. It's not all sweetness and light, and she talks a lot about some of the more complex issues that have been mentioned.
"While these days it's not uncommon to meet children with gay parents, in the 1970s it was. Alysia Abbott was one of those kids. When her parents met, her father — Steve Abbott — told her mother he was bisexual. But when Alysia was a toddler, her mother died in a car accident and Steve came out as gay. He moved with his daughter to San Francisco, just as the gay liberation movement was gaining strength. While her father had not initially wanted a child, Abbott says he enjoyed spending time with her when she was a baby. Her mother's death brought the two of them even closer. "After my mother's death, I think my father felt like he didn't have very much," Abbott tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross. "His relationship with a young man that he had while he was with my mother had dissolved. And he, in a sense, felt that I was all that he had in the world, and he was all that I had in the world." In San Francisco, as Abbott describes in her new memoir, Fairyland, her father immersed himself in the city's gay arts scene, becoming a leading literary figure. His daughter also became a part of that community, but as she grew older, Abbott found herself struggling to parse where she fit in. The scene at the literary events her father attended, for example, began to turn her off. She says: "I was like, 'OK, I've seen that transgressive, weird thing, and it's just a little too weird for me. I'm not interested in that.' " Fairyland is based largely on her father's journals, which she found after her father's death from AIDS-related complications in 1992, when she was 22. It was reading the journals, she says, that helped her see more clearly the situation they were in together from her father's perspective. "Unfortunately, he died just as I was becoming an adult," she says. "To be revisiting the journals now ... I have so much more sympathy for his struggles and respect the fact that he was a single father living among roommates, trying to find love as an openly gay man, and also trying to make a name for himself as a writer." Here's the NPR profile on the book with excerpts from the interview 'Fairyland': A Girl Grows Up In San Francisco's Gay Community : NPR and here's the link to the audio NPR Media Player |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Quote:
I am guessing we probably agree on more issues than we disagree on and you seem very kind and patient in your responses. Thank you for sharing your thoughts in such a way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Quote:
And, in keeping with such honesty, it is a great indictment of a great number of heterosexual parents in the US today. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 | |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Quote:
The only study cited in the original article (are there others?) contained the vague summary that children of same-sex couples "compared favorably" with children of opposite sex couples. Let's say, for example, a study comes to a different conclusion - that children of same sex couples did not compare favorably with children of opposite sex couples. Would the study be accepted with the same authority as the original? Would the study be examined to validate the testing methodology? Or would the study be deemed "homophobic" and discarded entirely. The underlying concept to this discussion is: does each sex (male/female) bring separate, qualities to a relationship focused on raising a child. While men may take on the "mothering" role (which has been done long before same sex adoption - single dads regularly take on this role) - does this fully equal (thus replace) the mothering role provide by a woman? The fact that this may be irrelevant to some does not invalidate it as a concept to discuss, especially when we are trying to draw a picture of the ideal. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 | |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,674
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,674
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
Quote:
Or until anti-gay forces can fund a rigged study to show their "science" as we saw with the Regenerus "study" done just in time for SCOTUS arguments last March. Instead of playing the race card, seems we now play the gay card whereby anti-gay organizations can complain that it's only political correctness that prevents social science from validating their own viewpoints. Just as we have scientists funded by energy companies to "dispute" global warming science, so to are we going to have "tough questions" that pretend to bravely question the stranglehold that gay liberal forces apparently have upon the APA. It's like Middle East politics. If you don't like the results, discredit the process. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 | |
Galeonbroad
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,778
Local Time: 10:54 AM
|
Quote:
Let's just hope we get to that point some day for all. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,172
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
I just really struggle to comprehend the seeming notion that there is some vast existing majority of straight male and straight female parents out there with their perfect families, the perfect model. To set that up as the model ideal that gay families somehow automatically fail to live up to simply because they are two men or two women, well to me THAT is a false model. ALL families have some sort of difficulties to deal with, who ever knows what exists behind closed doors. I don't have kids, but I think I still know something about what makes for a healthy and happy family. I know by the opposite, unfortunately. And I know with 100 percent certainly that a male and female parent does NOT equate to automatically correct gender modeling. A gay man is perfectly capable of modeling what makes for a good man for a male child, or what could make for a good male partner for a female child. A gay woman, the same. It's about modeling basic goodness and human decency, not stereotypes about what makes a man a man or a woman a woman. Yes there will be times when you might want to get a different gender's perspective on things, when you're a teenager or whatever. That's why they say it takes a village, a healthy family doesn't exist in a vacuum..keeping out all outside opinions and influences.
Bottom line for me is- what all parents should be doing is providing love, security, friendship, self esteem and confidence boosting, and so many more things I don't have the time to list here. And any healthy functioning adult is capable of providing that. Kids of straight couples have plenty of struggles growing up with parents who are alcoholics and drug addicts, parents who are emotionally and physically abusive, parents who have never dealt with their own demons, parents who are selfish and never should have had children. And many more struggles. THAT is reality, not this idyllic utopia that doesn't exist. Maybe it does for the lucky few, but that hardly makes it the gold standard that gay couples fail to live up to just because they are gay. The kind of person you are makes you the kind of parent you are. So does the kind of relationship you have with your spouse. That relationship is about love, trust, communication-all that stuff. Not about gay or straight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,669
Local Time: 04:54 AM
|
Quote:
When faced with personal stories such as Pac mule's, I hear from Aeon that of course you wouldn't say that he shouldn't have been raised by two women, but I'm having a hard time trying to see where the line gets drawn between acceptable deviation from "the ideal" and unacceptable. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
Quote:
Instead of lamenting and getting nervous over gay parents raising kids - and even doing a great job at it - why not focus on making straight parents better? There's plenty of straight parents who are not good role models for their kids in anyway, and to say they're still better parents because they are straight is wrong. Really, I think some people who are against same-sex marriage and same-sex parenting are just nervous that homosexuals may do a better job than straights, thus proving that some gender expectations and roles no longer fit in today's world. Instead of kicking and screaming over this, they should re-examine what went wrong with heterosexual relationships and come up with rational ideas on solving problems like single parenthood, fewer straight men wanting to get married, things like that. Of course, the people who aren't happy about homosexual parenting are the last people to get involved in fixing the heterosexual world. Oh, and in regards to taking a village to raise a child - many societies and cultures have extended families taking care of the kids. Sure, the parents are the prime guardians and role models, but the uncles, aunts, cousins, grandparents are always nearby (sometimes in the same house) and raising kids is a family thing. So, gay parents have good company. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,096
Local Time: 04:54 AM
|
Quote:
![]() And that "village" mentality is where the needs of an opposite-sex child being raised by a gay couple get met. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,566
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
Quote:
Thank you for your post. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,566
Local Time: 05:54 AM
|
I think a child might miss having a mother or a father and feel a loss (an experience I know from friends who grew up in single parent households). But in many cases the father/mother missing would not have made great, supportive parents. I think, as Mrs. Springsteen said so eloquently, it is important for children to have an entire support network of both sexes that do not need to be their parents, but need to provide a broader experience (And this goes for children who have both a mother and a father). They need the aunt who encourages mischief and the male family friend who does all that guy stuff that women don't quite get--like introduce the kids to The Three Stooges. They need a constant presence and acceptance in their lives from both sexes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | ||
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Quote:
Again, for discussion purposes (I would hope we all view these threads as AEON described: Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Nothing even close. We should scratch our heads if all we see is a vague reference to an executive summary from one study. As Irvine has informed us, there are other studies that do come to different conclusions. We can ignore one study or the other based on the result we are seeking, or we can evaluate and weigh the conclusions of two or more studies in thoughtful discussion – what I thought was the intention of this thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:54 AM
|
Quote:
Your post gave me the opportunity to look into the Regenerus study. I can see why Ligtvoet did not cite this study as it would have required far more significant analysis than intended for his article. What Irvine fails to mention is the study faced political opposition, but more importantly, scientific peer review. The peer review validated Regenerus’ work, both at the University of Texas (where Regenerus works) and on a national stage. A preemptive attempt to discredit the process is not worthy of this thread. If you are going to start a thread seeking discussion, we deserve a better response. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|