not sure who you are responding too, but it seems like you are now arguing against a strawman. I haven't seen anyone say anything like this.
You think that the last 1/3 of this set is going to make for a great show and be really well received? (Notice I didn't say stink up the joint, or people demand their money back) You think playing 11 new songs, of which none of them are hits, is a good idea?
I don't know if the last third of the show will be well received or make for a great show.
I don't know if playing 11 songs from the last 2 albums is a good idea.
I haven't seen the show. Nobody has.
What I do know is that poo pooing the show based on a paper setlist, knowing their history for putting on amazing live shows, is a little ridiculous.
As a fan I'd rather they play even more new songs and non hits. The song I'm most upset about not being on the rumored set is Little Things, not Streets.
But far as the average concert goer enjoying the show based on this set list, that depends on whether or not they perform it well.
What, nobody here has ever gone to a concert and not known many of the songs being played and been blown away by the performance itself?
If they have confidence in what they're playing, play the songs well and have a great multimedia clusterfuck to to on with them - it will be well received.
If they don't, it won't.
Last edited: