carrieluvv said:you get oreilly in israel?
Irvine511 said:
are you being ironic?
because if there's ANYONE on TV more guilty of shoving his ideas down someone's throats, telling people to shut up, cutting their mics, framing the discussion in a position most favorable to him, selling himself as a brand (a sort of "avenging angel of the working classes"), making the show about him first and foremost, trading on cheap shots and easy anger (pedophile priests! the corruption of your children!) instead of the real issues that are difficult to discuss and don't lend themselves to outrage, and all combined with his homophobia that he seems to think makes him all that much more heterosexual ... then it is Bill O'Reilly.
nbcrusader said:Funny how we get angry about Bill O'Reilly getting other people angry. Isn't this just another form of hate?
doubleU said:
Politics seem to be a vicious circle of hate these days.
nbcrusader said:
I agree, and some seem energized by it.
I stay away from politics as much as possible.
doubleU said:
Yeah, me too.
But I do find this place interesting. So far pretty civil, but it does seem to lean a little. But that's OK too.
nbcrusader said:Funny how we get angry about Bill O'Reilly getting other people angry. Isn't this just another form of hate?
Irvine511 said:so are you suggesting that anger is hate?
nbcrusader said:
Hate has an object. One gets angry about what is said, done, suggested, etc. One hates the person who does it.
nbcrusader said:Funny how we get angry about Bill O'Reilly getting other people angry. Isn't this just another form of hate?
nbcrusader said:Just pointing out how we can move down the continuum from anger over and issue, to hate directed towards a person.
Irvine511 said:Bill O'Reilly only cares about making working class white people angry.