beegee
Neon Zebra
I'm glad you liked it so much.
It wasn't easy rowing my canoe all the way to Australia to deliver it, either.
It wasn't easy rowing my canoe all the way to Australia to deliver it, either.
Gah, I don't think its a good adaptation at all, its a great movie but the satire really just seems tacked onto the style in the movie, the actors and Fincher do a hell of a job, but the novel is a masterpiece the screenplay didn't grasp, but I really don't think any of his satire could ever fully translate on screen. The plots are just absolutely ridiculous and easily visualized, which would make them all ripe for adaptation (except when he goes over the top disgusting), but I think the spirit of them isn't meant for film. However I did agree with them changing the ending, the ambivalent and dreamy ending works great for the book, especially after the heady twist but ending they wrote works better for a film... and their terrorist plot makes more sense in a real world setting.
Also, every time I see it, Pitt fits the character less and less.
Anyway glad you liked the book, its probably my favorite novel of the 90's, if you're into more Palahniuk I'd suggest Survivor and Lullaby, I think almost all of his books are ridiculously entertaining, but those are the other two where creative ambition and craft shines through his over-the-top-ness, the material and the style are matched perfectly, where he goes crazy trying too hard to be different and gross with some of his more recent stuff. Though Rant, Diary and Invisible Monsters come close to being awesome.
I've been meaning to check out some Cunningham, tell me what you think! I was aiming to pick up the ones that hadn't been adapted yet, just get some fresh perspective on his writing, even if The Hours is his most famous book.
I can tolerate reading the book then seeing the film, but the reverse is really difficult for me, and it almost always kills the enjoyment. Silence of the Lambs was an exception to this, so was The Godfather. That's about it.
Really, No Country's a fast read? I've always had trouble staying focused on McCarthy's writing because of how rambly he is, beautiful prose but the lack of structure can be annoying in the context of what his stories are about. The exception being the Road since that's written in verse almost, and sparse as hell. But I never looked at No Country before seeing the movie... so the dilemma comes into play again.
That looks like it's right up my alley!
Realistically, most Mormon pioneers were too poor for covered wagons, and used handcarts instead. Maybe I should read read 7 or 8 books on both covered wagons and handcarts to see which I'd prefer.
Well, we know what just shot to the top of GAF's reading list.
Or what is now the inaugural item on it.
As for Cormac McCarthy, I just started reading Blood Meridian, which my friend told me The Road wouldn't even come close to preparing me for.
I'm scared, frankly.
Maybe that's why it's taking me months to get through No Country For Old Men, I'm just never in the mood to pick it up.
I read Black Hawk Down after seeing the movie, and enjoyed it a great deal, but I can't think of many other good "book after the movie" experiences. (Starship Troopers doesn't count, as I couldn't remember the movie, and the book isn't much like it in the first place)
You'd perhaps like Guests of the Ayatollah, as it's by the same author as Black Hawk Down. Actually, it probably more depends on whether you're interested in the Iranian hostage crisis than their being by the same author.