vaz02 said:IF ya shoved Zooropa and rattle and hum infront of a non u2 fans face, rattle and hum will be in the bin 1st.
david said:
Why would R&H be in the bin first? That album contains songs that have been played a lot on tour and as well as the radio, Angel of Harlem, Desire, and All I Want Is You.
vaz02 said:
I personally cant stand the whole Rattle and hum gig, its too country and western. While zooropa reflects the european market at the mid point of the 90's.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
But honestly I can't compare the two...
WalkOnTheEdge said:
No freaking way. People that really like them but maybe not to the point where they are joining U2 boards or seeking out bootlegs, those people laugh at Zooropa. They think it sucks. Because the fact is, you have to be a DIE HARD, I LIVE FOR THIS BAND type of fan to like Zooropa.
I'm a huge fan. I have all of the official DVD's and CD's, I listen to them CONSTANTLY, I never shut up about them with my friends, yet I had to get rid of Zooropa because I detest that horrible piece of crap. Next to Van Halen 3 (with Gary Cherone) it's the only CD I've ever thrown in the trash. Literally, in the trash....and I've never regretted it.
WalkOnTheEdge said:
Because the fact is, you have to be a DIE HARD, I LIVE FOR THIS BAND type of fan to like Zooropa.
WalkOnTheEdge said:
Because the fact is, you have to be a DIE HARD, I LIVE FOR THIS BAND type of fan to like Zooropa.
Earnie Shavers said:
No way. I know more than a few CD collections that have Zooropa in there but not a Joshua Tree to be found, nor would JT even be considered. You can't pigeonhole taste so narrowly. Zooropa DEFINITELY has its own massive fanclub, within and outside the general diehard U2 community.
Axver said:They both have a couple of excellent songs, a few good ones, and a couple of pretty uninteresting ones.