Angela Harlem
Jesus Online
A radio station is Sydney is running a pretty cool comp where they announce a moral dilemma and if you are the person to get through and say the same answer as the majority of Sydney you win $1000. Anyways, the dilemmas are quite interesting that they come up with.
Earlier they had this one:
Part 1: You are in Thailand* on holidays. You get arrested for drug trafficking. You are innocent. You have doubts about your friend though. You have been given 2 choices.
Do you stay and take the heat with him/her and face trial? Or do you admit you think your friend might have something to hide and therefore get off scott free meaning they face the trial alone?
Part 2: These are double moral dilemmas and there is always a second part to them, which may or may not affect your decision. In this case, if you had decided to stay with your friend, you later find out from them that they have had prior drug charges back in Sydney [insert relevant city here].
If you answered 'stay' first off, part 2 applies. If you didn't, ignore it and vote accordingly.
*Thailand can/will execute people found guilty of trafficking
Earlier they had this one:
Part 1: You are in Thailand* on holidays. You get arrested for drug trafficking. You are innocent. You have doubts about your friend though. You have been given 2 choices.
Do you stay and take the heat with him/her and face trial? Or do you admit you think your friend might have something to hide and therefore get off scott free meaning they face the trial alone?
Part 2: These are double moral dilemmas and there is always a second part to them, which may or may not affect your decision. In this case, if you had decided to stay with your friend, you later find out from them that they have had prior drug charges back in Sydney [insert relevant city here].
If you answered 'stay' first off, part 2 applies. If you didn't, ignore it and vote accordingly.
*Thailand can/will execute people found guilty of trafficking