drhark said:
Why do you assume I have religious beliefs? That argument's a cop out.
I believe that human value lies in it's very essence.
Others on the opposing side of this issue believe the value of human life is determined by one's ability or potential or "viability".
We disagree. This is not a religious argument even though you're making it one.
Freedom of choice? Is that kind of like the right to privacy?
The word "choice" is so vague. Freedom of choice means absolutely nothing and has no basis in law.
This case raises many difficult questions and as I said before we need to answer them or the "other side" answers them for us.
I get SO sick of being labeled as religious and basing all my beliefs on that instead of thinking for myself. I'm not really all that religious, I mean, I'm a believer, but I don't even go to church. My beliefs are based simply on human decency, and right and wrong! It's like some people here can't believe or respect that anyone could think that way, they have to be brainwashed by Pat Robertson or something There are some people here who can't ever address our opinions as us actually having MINDS and hearts, it always has to be 'you right-to-lifers' or some other label, as if everyone with that opinion read it on the 700 club or in a mailer from Jerry Falwell and is following a crowd and not thinking for ourselves t's actually very insulting.
Last edited: