Zoots
Blue Crack Supplier
Space/Time Distortion of Awesomeness! !!!
I think the problem is still not so much that people are getting attacked about their opinion, but that some people keep portaying their opinions as facts and seem to not want to recognise this in any waybsp77 said:People should be able to give their opinions without being attacked.
Salome said:I think the problem is still not so much that people are getting attacked about their opinion, but that some people keep portaying their opinions as facts and seem to not want to recognise this in any way
Salome said:I think the problem is still not so much that people are getting attacked about their opinion, but that some people keep portaying their opinions as facts and seem to not want to recognise this in any way
Zootlesque said:
You do realize that not everybody uses IMO or 'in my opinion' when saying something, even if they do mean it as just their opinion! I can see how it can get annoying to use IMO every single time you say something.
What I don't get is it's all just opinion anyway. This whole website is just opinion except for the News section. Then why do people get their panties in a bunch???
Zootlesque said:
You do realize that not everybody uses IMO or 'in my opinion' when saying something, even if they do mean it as just their opinion! I can see how it can get annoying to use IMO every single time you say something.
What I don't get is it's all just opinion anyway. This whole website is just opinion except for the News section. Then why do people get their panties in a bunch???
I don't need to see "IMO" 250 timesZootlesque said:
You do realize that not everybody uses IMO or 'in my opinion' when saying something, even if they do mean it as just their opinion! I can see how it can get annoying to use IMO every single time you say something.
What I don't get is it's all just opinion anyway. This whole website is just opinion except for the News section. Then why do people get their panties in a bunch???
it doesn't piss me offU2Man said:
Would you please stop portraying your opinion as a fact? It reeeeeaaally pisses me off.
imo.
Salome said:it doesn't piss me off
but it seems only fair that if you want people to listen to you, yuo try to figure what part of what your saying is opinion and what part is fact if only to make a better arguement
fall back plan is always sarcasm though
silly it might beU2Man said:
I believe most adults can separate opinions from facts without having to be guided through.
This discussion is silly, anyway.
Zootlesque said:
You do realize that not everybody uses IMO or 'in my opinion' when saying something, even if they do mean it as just their opinion! I can see how it can get annoying to use IMO every single time you say something.
What I don't get is it's all just opinion anyway. This whole website is just opinion except for the News section. Then why do people get their panties in a bunch???
U2 girl: I cannot just say "No. I don't like HTDAAB." or "No, I hate HTDAAB." because I do not hate it. Just trying to point out the things I don't like about it. Or the way U2 seems to have approached the recording of this album, IMO. But if you like it a lot, so be it. If Aygo thinks it is the greatest album ever and that Yahweh is the greatest song ever then fine. Newsflash: Opinions differ! What're we fighting about again?
You know, they closed the "new direction in next U2 album "thread in Where The Album Has No Name. Funny thing is, it had nothing to do with the actual discussion. It was because Aygo and Snowlock starting cursing at each other. Damn shame because it was actually a thought-provoking thread for once.
That's not what's been happening here, but... agreed.People should be able to give their opinions without being attacked.
Salome said:
but I do enjoy a bit of bickering anyway
BonoVoxSupastar said:
But when someone says, "Album B was considered a failure by the majority of fans because it was too complex" is opinion sold as fact.
Aygo said:
But please, I'd ask not to refer my nickname again in an ocasion the one on page 4 of this thread. Thank you.
U2Man said:
I would say it's either a false statement or a true statement. Not an opinion.
onyourkneesboy said:Stop arguing like little children and just comment on the initial thread, for f... sake!! [/B]
Canadiens1160 said:
It would, er, help if the initial thread made sense.
That's a good argument why there shouldn't be any HTDAAB-bashing: ATYCLB sucks! Says cypress. And he's right of course, 'cause we suffer from a lack of musical good taste.cypress said:Yup, looks like every other HTDAAB-bashing thread.
(...)
ATYCLB is roughly half an album with a bunch of B-sides thrown in. Other than New York, the back end of the album is below average at best. And anyone who thinks the second half of ATYCLB is up to U2's standards, IMO, shows a lack of musical good taste.
WalkOn21 said:That's a good argument why there shouldn't be any HTDAAB-bashing: ATYCLB sucks! Says cypress. And he's right of course, 'cause we suffer from a lack of musical good taste.
cypress said:
ATYCLB is roughly half an album with a bunch of B-sides thrown in. Other than New York, the back end of the album is below average at best. And anyone who thinks the second half of ATYCLB is up to U2's standards, IMO, shows a lack of musical good taste.