smileymbcastard
War Child
Just enjo the concert carrying a camera is a pain. i did it last time and its not worth it. go enjoy the memories will be in your head.
I just witnessed an amazing show in Toronto.
The NIN/JA tour. I like NIN....but I also wanted to see Jane's Addiction since I've never seen them.
What was most interesting, was Trent, NIN's singer, released this information for the tour.
I'd like to see U2 do the same. The when in doubt leave it at home is in reference to the mosh pit.
I managed to take some decent pictures as I had floor seats. But it reminded me that I definitely need a new camera for the U2 tour. I'm now thinking about the Canon SX200 IS. It shoots video in HD.
In an effort to allow you to document your experience at the upcoming NIN/JA performances, we will be relaxing our photo/video policy (5/7/09 - 6/12/09 only). Fans will be permitted to bring in their personal cameras, video and audio recorders. This is not not an open door policy for any and all recording devices. Please try to use common sense as we are trying to ensure this experience is great for everyone attending. Don't show up with a television crew and a recording studio.
To be clear: this applies only to the North American NIN/JA tour.
for people that have had multiple point n' shooters and been able to compare, how big of a difference is there between 3X Optical Zoom------5X Opticial zoom?
Is it is really worth $200 to upgrade to a new camera for this function?
I have a current 3X zoom, and am not 100% please with it from my Vertigo pictures. Now I cant upgrade to a professional camera with extended zoom (like 10X) cuz i wont get it into the stadium past security. However, the small type point n shooter they allow into concerts really only go as high as 5X from what i can find. So is it really worth $200 to buy a new camera for this?
Does anyone have a decent small camera that doesn't take forever for the picture to 'load' into the camera or save on the memory card or whatever. Mine takes anywhere from 3-8 seconds to be ready for the next shot and it drives me crazy.
Is the camera set to display the picture? Most cameras are set that way. I always turn that off or put to 0 seconds. I can shoot nonstop with my DSLR using pretty cheap cards, so I doubt with a point-and-shoot it's a size/speed issue. It's either the camera displaying the picture first, or the time it takes to re-focus. The first can be adjusted, the second is just the limitation of a point and shoot.
I love Trent Reznor.
He's a Twitter freak, too. That is SO cool about the recording policy. It's basically an unstated policy for most shows anyway, but I like that Trent has the balls to embrace it.
Mark
*The event may be recorded live for use in the forum of sound recordings, television videotapes and other
means of audio and audiovisual reproductions, now known to be invented.
The close-ups were probably close enough to be in flash range, but the lighting & mood would be completely lost if a flash were used.
I would like to know if anyone was able to bring in their DSLR into the Camp Nou.
I would like to know if anyone was able to bring in their DSLR into the Camp Nou.
Thanks, I didn't know you could turn that feature off.
Consumer Reports Magazine this month has a whole big huge article (and cover) on the best digital cameras, separated into three categories - small and lightweight, fast and good zoom and I forget what the 3rd was. But good article with lots of good info.
Apparently some people did.
Here's one from way up in the stands:
U2 in Barcelona - 360º World Tour on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
flickr has some other ones as well, but I'm not sure how close the people were to the stage.