BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
I understand your post, I just don't understand why you don't actually address the questions asked or the topic at hand.I think you just don't understand my posts and act like a snob and superior. I read my articles and other people's articles and I just don't always reach the same conclusion you do.
Well a lot of times you don't read my posts or other posters.Also what you think is important in a discussion is often not what other people think is important so they will not follow YOUR template. I think you ignore my posts by far more with:
"Stop drinking the Kool-Aid"
"You didn't read my post"
"That's not a good source"
and more brilliant "gotcha" moments like that. Anybody can do that. You also like to ask people to bring TONS of evidence from the internet to back up their opinions yet I don't see you doing the same either. It's like a tactic to wear posters out while you use one sentence responses. Why don't you do some work for a change? Why is it that other conservative posters complain about the same responses from you? Is it because all conservatives are stupid and don't read posts or is it because they don't saying things in agreement with you?
And sources are very important, not just in here, in life. A report on global warming written by a guy who took one meteorology class in college isn't going to cut it. When you post a source that's just dripping with obvious bias, how is anyone suppose to take it seriously?
I don't ask for tons of evidence but if you make a specific statement then be prepared to back it up, that goes for everywhere, you had to site your sources in college, right? If I make a post and you don't believe my facts then ask for a source I'll be glad to provide one.
This has nothing to do with me not liking what you are saying, it's about just being able to back up what you say and being courteous enough to discuss the issue at hand. You often come off as someone who likes to "talk" a lot but never really "listens".
I don't think the Iraqi surplus is as important in the discussion as you do. Too bad. You have to learn to agree to disagree instead of belabouring small points, and brow beating posters.
And that's fine if you don't think the surplus is important. But don't quote someone's and then go on and on about something else and not address the quote. Or at least explain why you think we should be footing the bill and not the country that is benefitting from it. But you didn't do that, you just kept going on and on how we shouldn't just bail, when no one suggested that. You don't argue that the sky is blue if no one hasn't suggested otherwise, that would be pointless.
This had nothing, absolutely nothing to do with me disagreeing with your stance, it had everything to do with your approach to "discussing" it.