AliEnvy
Refugee
Calluna said:Remember guys, we're talking about adult cigarette smoking here not heroin.
Perspective is good lol
But my position isn't about the substance it's about random testing for any substance overstepping privacy.
Calluna said:Remember guys, we're talking about adult cigarette smoking here not heroin.
I understand and I support your position.AliEnvy said:
Perspective is good lol
But my position isn't about the substance it's about random testing for any substance overstepping privacy.
nbcrusader said:Drug use does not remain a completely off-duty activity. Affects of drug use are brought into the workplace.
nbcrusader said:Therefore, airport screening makes sense in limited cases.
nbcrusader said:
Airport security involves both examination of the person and their property.
Drug screening involves urination into a different container. In a bathroom. With no one else around.
AliEnvy said:Canada tried a Hitler move in the early 90s by raising federal taxes on cigarettes to prohibitive price levels to get people to quit. It might as well have been prohibition. The black market became so strong, organized and efficient it created a whole marketplace in an underground economy. So the feds backed off and prices came down below pre-black market levels.
AliEnvy said:
Why are you still comparing the two?
A no-exceptions security policy in an airport exists because anyone can be a severe security risk.
How can it be established that any employee in any job can pose a severe workplace risk?
nbcrusader said:
Because anyone pose a severe workplace risk due to drug use.