U2Bama
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Perhaps you are addressing me as some type of "religious right" theocrat, which I am not. In fact, I do not favor theocracy.
Also, Jesus' command to "turn the other cheek" dealt with personal self defense, not necessarily with defending another person (as Due Moore was doing).
I am not sure if your intent in applying wome type of "What Would Jesus Do" standard to Due Moore and what he encountered; we don't know from these articles what religion he follows. But while we're at it, I've already stated that the original translation from Mosaic law was "Thou Shalt Not Murder," not "Thou Shalt Not Kill (in Any Situation Including That Of Defending A Person In A Wal-Mart Deli)."
You're asking us to seperate the wrongful actions of Felix Vigil from this case, but apply religious teachings to it. But the specifics of the case, and what Felix Vigil was doing, are crucial to this situation.
Yes, at your invitation, I will call it sidetracking, because that is exactly what you're doing. You're using this thread as a forum to address your grievances with Christianity, Christian morals and with Christians (inlcuding NBCrusader who hasn't even posted in here so I don't know why you brought him into it; perhaps he'll consider it an honor) when this case has all to do with U.S. and New Mexico law.
Why do you talk so nasty? You used to be so nice back when brettig and zooropamanda were around. Gosh you get angry whenever you encounter someone with an opinion different from yours.
~U2Alabama
Also, Jesus' command to "turn the other cheek" dealt with personal self defense, not necessarily with defending another person (as Due Moore was doing).
I am not sure if your intent in applying wome type of "What Would Jesus Do" standard to Due Moore and what he encountered; we don't know from these articles what religion he follows. But while we're at it, I've already stated that the original translation from Mosaic law was "Thou Shalt Not Murder," not "Thou Shalt Not Kill (in Any Situation Including That Of Defending A Person In A Wal-Mart Deli)."
You're asking us to seperate the wrongful actions of Felix Vigil from this case, but apply religious teachings to it. But the specifics of the case, and what Felix Vigil was doing, are crucial to this situation.
Yes, at your invitation, I will call it sidetracking, because that is exactly what you're doing. You're using this thread as a forum to address your grievances with Christianity, Christian morals and with Christians (inlcuding NBCrusader who hasn't even posted in here so I don't know why you brought him into it; perhaps he'll consider it an honor) when this case has all to do with U.S. and New Mexico law.
Why do you talk so nasty? You used to be so nice back when brettig and zooropamanda were around. Gosh you get angry whenever you encounter someone with an opinion different from yours.
~U2Alabama