doctorwho
Rock n' Roll Doggie VIP PASS
BonoVoxSupastar said:
I think you're missing the point which is why a check in the first place. If you tell everyone to wear a bra, fine. If someone walks in and it's obvious someone's not, then make a complaint. Innocent until proven guilty. But you don't have to pat everyone down everyday and lift their shirt if you can't find a clasp. It's like those parents who ask their child if they made poopy in their pants and when the parent doesn't believe them they check for themselves in front of their playmates. These people are adults and need to be treated as such, not babies with diapers.
Now is it worth 9 mil, probably not, but that's mostly the lawyers fault.
O.K., last post in this thread.
I comprehend your point - and I agree that this bra-checking policy seems asinine. Nonetheless, it exists. Unfortunately, we don't know all the facts. But maybe there's a darn good reason for the policy and the daily check.
However, your point about "adults not being children" is not only irrelevant but incorrect. In fact, adults need to be checked far more often than children! Adults know that certain jobs require safety gear and special clothes and protection, yet often they don't wear it - usually for reasons of inconvenience. Yet, a safety officer or supervisor will (or should) enforce the policies. Same is true here. For example, perhaps the women at this employer need bras for a safety reasons, but a few women might have disregarded this policy. They were injured. So now the management was forced to institute this bra-checking policy, rather than trust their "adult" employees. It may be humiliating, but far better than getting hurt and losing $$ or more.
But as I wrote, we don't know both sides of this story.
Last edited: