Not to wade too deeply into the muck again -
If, in 10 years when the band retires and Larry comes out and says you were right, the five of us left here on the forum will be sure to give you your cookie for being right.
Keep your cookie; I'll take the truth as my reward.
Not to wade too deeply into the muck again - why are we automatically accepting Bono's reason on this radio show, when other band members have cited the reason being that it was one too many mid tempo numbers?
Now, I certainly am not saying that I think one explanation or the other is the whole truth - but I do think that if they felt it was the best song on the record, they simply would have worked it out.
I mean, while Bono said he couldn't sing it night after night (importantly distinct from couldn't sing it at all), he also mentioned that he did sing songs that he strained on (like RHMT) and and ruined the next show. If they cared enough about the song, they simply would have just done it anyway.
So in the end - I don't think we can say that it was never played because Bono can't sing it. I think we CAN say that it was exceptionally difficult to sing, and the fact that it was a mid tempo number meant it was easier for them to nix.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
It actually has touches of stuccato rap in the vocal. And some bum notes by Edge...on purpose?
Actually after several listens. RHMT is actually a snoozer of a song.
Not to kill anyone's buzz but I have listened to the 2017 remix at least a half dozen times today and it's just not doing it for me like the original version. Now I need to add that RHMT was the first song I connected with on JT when I bought it in March 1987. The new vocals are kinda so so like Bono popped into the studio for 30 minutes and just did 1 take. And the horns? I can see why they were buried in the original mix. I saw an earlier post where someone commented they gave the song some punch and filled some of the empty space with the remix.. But it's the fucking Joshua Tree! The space and atmospherics in the songs are one of the things That make it such a great album. All in all, a half assed remix of an already great song
And in all this...still no one can come to terms with the fact that re-recording it has zero zilch nada to do with Bono's vocals or his ability or inability to perform this song. [emoji23]
And in all this...still no one can come to terms with the fact that re-recording it has zero zilch nada to do with Bono's vocals or his ability or inability to perform this song. [emoji23]
You bitches all need to come to terms with the FACT that redhill was RIGHT and you were WRONG.
FIVE people knew Bono couldn't sing that song. FOUR are in U2 and one is named redhill.
Deal with it losers.
Just talk about the song.
Poor ole' Nicky...you just made yourself the perfect example.
Pretty sure you were one of the people claiming RHMT was left off the original setlist for reasons other than Bono's singing.
Which Bono just proved incorrect.
And then he's going to prove he was lying by performing it in the same key that was apparently too hard to sing in 87? [emoji23]
That's bitchy Nicky to you.
Now, if you don't mind, please do try to stick with talking about the song, as you've been patiently asked many times before. Cheers.
He's trying to prove that he's a better singer now than he was in 87...
Well wasn't you're entire argument that they were re-recording it because he needs to do it in a lower key to suit his modern voice?
And boom, the track drops and lo and behold it's in the same key as it was on the album.
So unless you're about to come up with some wild theory that we're going to see a hologram of 87 Bono during the chorus on tour, what was essentially your core argument is going to effectively be proven wrong. Lol
You legit actually started a thread about him not being able to sing it like 87 again. Now you're saying he'll be able to - maybe even better it - because he sings better now? Can we pick an opinion here? Lol
Anyways, wouldn't you basically just burn your fan card/smash all your U2 cds if they actually used pre-recorded 87 vocals live with a hologram? Talk about an absurd idea..
Anyways, wouldn't you basically just burn your fan card/smash all your U2 cds if they actually used pre-recorded 87 vocals live with a hologram? Talk about an absurd idea..