"cuz cock is big....it's bigger.....than us....."
I bought WITS cos it had live versions of Zoo Station and Kite.
It's a weird old music format...sort of like a physical version of an MP3 file, but shaped like a record. Sounds insane, I know, but it seemed cool at the time.Ceeeeee......Dee?
That sounds like it'd be hard to go to the exact place in a song you wanted to go to. Did you have to skip through minutes of music by holding a button?It's a weird old music format...sort of like a physical version of an MP3 file, but shaped like a record. Sounds insane, I know, but it seemed cool at the time.
The nineties were strange times, man.That sounds like it'd be hard to go to the exact place in a song you wanted to go to. Did you have to skip through minutes of music by holding a button?
How did people store thousands of 'CDs'???? Think about how much space that must have taken up, and all the boxes to move them from one house to another.
What did people do if they were at a friend's house but wanted to listen to one of their CDs back at their own house? What if you were overseas and wanted to listen to a CD in your collection?
Weird.
Not to dive into digital music formats headfirst and confuse everyone here, but to lay it out for you, the tradeoff isn't between physical, good quality music vs. digital, wishy washy crappy quality at all.I have thousands sitting behind me right now, it's not a big deal. I'll take physical to shitty rips on horrible sound systems or ear buds any day.
Quite the opposite. We are back in 1950s/1960s land, where singles are the norm and cohesive LP-style albums are the rarity.Regardless, that's all besides the point. They're abandoning any sort of physical format for singles, which means the "single" as a format could be dead as far as major labels go. Bye, bye, b-sides.
EwwwwwwwwwwJust discovered I own a physical copy of The Saints Are Coming.
I am disgusted with myself.
Also, I challenge anyone to mount a decent rationale for having physical media back in terms of CDs.