I will dissect you post piece by piece.
No U2.com don't get it right in their press releases, they're all bunch of f***king amateurs.
Do you actually know what is involved in the process of writing a press release? Believe me a U2.com press release is not going to be written by some junior clerk making assumptions.
It wasn't a press release, it was a news article. And yes, it may suprise you that someone as dumb as I actually works in Government. I don't mean I process social security checques, I mean I work for a Government Minister on his personal staff. I am well aware how press releases are written, and that they often use quotations and sources to form the evidence, and that these sources can sometimes prove to be incorrect. I notice that the part you allude to is not a direct quote.
What is obvious is that Tripoli evolved into Being Born. This doesn't mean they have to be identical though, kind of like how Xanax & Wine became Fast Cars.
From a musical perspective Xanax and Fast Cars are virtually identical. They are the same song, but one has distorted guitars as well and some extra lyrics. The Tripoli clip and Being Born are totally different songs.
Chromium Chords could be another name for Being Born/Tripoli. For instance Stand Up Comedy was originally called For Your Love then Stand Up.
Yes, but you haven't adressed the fact that both Chromium Chords AND Tripoli appear on the SAME running sheet. If it has changed names, why do they both appear at the same time?
They change their song titles a lot, most of the songs on the album have undergone a name change/s. Even Bono acknowledges their frequent name changes:
To me it seems highly unlikely that they would have two distinct songs (both experimental fare) about a French Moroccan cop going on a motorcycle ride.
You mean like how NLOTH has the lyric "I'm a traffic cop, rue de marais, the siren's wailing, but it's me that wants to get away" or how they made that movie that's about a french-morrocan cop on a motorcycle ride set to the entire album?
You're basing your theories, on the notion that Tripoli is some song heard in a Lanois documentary, because someone said "I feel like I can hear him sing....Tripoli".
I am basing it PARTLY on this. My other piece of solid evidence is outlined above. With regards to this, it is mine, and many many other's perceptions that Tripoli is what he is saying. I refer to your above point that You doubted there would be two songs on the album about a french-morrocan traffic cop on an album about a french-morrocan traffic cop? Well, it is less likely that two songs exist that reference Tripoli. I am yet to find a person that thinks he doesn't say Tripoli. In fact I believe we all thought he said Tripoli before we knew there was a song called Tripoli.
It could be something completely different, a lot of other words sound like 'Tripoli'
Name more words that sound like Tripoli
Also it could be just a random jam session, that didn't become any son. It could of course actually had been a part of 'Tripoli' (or Fez) that was discarded as the song evolved into Fez-Being Born.
Possible, but not probable. They are entirely in different keys, have different cadence, they are in no way similar enough to even suggest they were born of the same era.
People only got confused between White as Snow and Winter because previewers were reporting both as acoustic ballads set in Afghanistan. Winter is clearly not an acoustic ballad so the previewers were wrong (or confused themselves) or there were significant changes made to Winter.
Wrong again. Find me a quote that mentions that Winter is acoustic. It actually only says that it is set in an unspecified warzone. People made the mistake because they assumed that a song about snow was a song about winter.
While I understand why it's great to imagine that there are two separate songs called Tripoli and Being Born and that Tripoli will be on Songs of Ascent.
No amount of wishful thinking will make it a reality
No, very true. And by the same token, no amount of automatic, brainless contradiction will stop it form happening.
My point is, neither of us know for sure. While i am posting from the perpspective of, the evidence points to the fact that they are different, obviously that isn't gospel, but the evidence suggests it, you seem to be saying that this one press release from U2.com (the most unreliable band website on the net) which I note has been amended to NOT inculde what you refer to as the evidnce on the actual information on the album, is proof enough of god himself.
The evidence I am sighting is far more persuasive and volumous at this time. It doesn't mean I am 100% right, but it means I am more likely to be right.
And it appears from the previous posters that I have a bit of support on this.