Dragonfave
New Yorker
Chris Martin called in and asked them to stop copying his stuff.
I bet Bono replied: "How's the Joe Satriani lawsuit-thingy coming along?"
Chris Martin called in and asked them to stop copying his stuff.
The equals sign is the point that in theory there is "no line on the horizon"...without it people will say..."its called no line on the horizon, so why is there one on the cover"
Im for either keeping the equals sign or get a picture with no line on the horizon.
I do hope they remove it. Because the = sign reminds me of those gay bumper stickers.
The idea of showing a cover with a line on the horizon and then write No Line On the Horizon on top of it, is still garbage, equal sign or no equal sign.
The idea of showing a cover with a line on the horizon and then write No Line On the Horizon on top of it, is still garbage, equal sign or no equal sign.
Let's not take the title too literally, guys!
Here's a horizon with literally no line. Look how boring it is:
Let's not take the title too literally, guys!
Chris Martin called in and asked them to stop copying his stuff.
Um that is really offensive.
I hope they are removed too..reminds me of dull maths lessons at school.
Hope nobody is offended.
I want to punch that face so much.
I like the equals sign.
uhm I dn't get it. What is offensive about it...?
Um that is really offensive.
You mean the equality bumper sticker?
Man, you have some issues...
How is that offensive? I thought those stickers were representative of the "Gay rights movement"?
I'm sorry if what I said was offensive, but if someone wants to point out the offense please help me out?
How is that offensive? I thought those stickers were representative of the "Gay rights movement"?
I'm sorry if what I said was offensive, but if someone wants to point out the offense please help me out?
Your post reads as if you consider the perceived resemblance to gay rights stickers to be a bad thing. "Oh noez it looks like teh ghey!" and all that crap. If so, then yes, that is offensive.