mikal
Blue Crack Addict
America! Fuck Yeah!
Your whole argument makes no sense. There are plenty of bands that are big in America that I've NEVER heard of.
Dude, your country loves the JONAS BROTHERS and Highschool Musical.
That alone should say enough.
I don't believe in the whole if you don't make it in america stuff. Ofcourse u2 has loads of fans in America and they love them too, but it's not like you people are more fans than we are and that you should get the first hand treatment.
And let's not forget that U2 are already big, they don't have to become big in America anymore.
America! Fuck Yeah!
Calm down there Cheese Head...
I have an even better idea.
U2 should do an Ireland-only tour. This has even more benefits:
- Helps the even more doomed Irish economy
- Saves U2 lots of money and time by not even needing to leave home!
- They can play in indoor venues in Ireland for a change.
- U2 fans worldwide who've always wanted to visit Ireland finally have a better excuse then "uh ... I want to see Bono's house. No, I'm totally not a stalker, I swear!"
- Irish fans will be able to see U2 a hundred times rather than three.
- Somewhere that isn't Dublin might finally get a U2 gig again.
- All the flights to Ireland carrying U2 fans would help struggling North American airlines make ends meet.
- A Sort Of Homecoming might get back into the set.
For the last reason alone, this must happen.
Sure America is important, but not as important as some people here make it out to be.Ouch...you went THERE.
How doesn't it make sense? Look at music history. Its completely true. I'm not making it up. Doesn't matter if YOU or I don't believe it. Its True. Let me put it to you this way...yes, there are plenty of bands that have made it big in America that you haven't heard of. But those bands already have a much better chance of making it in the rest of the world as opposed to the other way around.
You know that many music companies have actually sent many American bands that they believe weren't ready to play in America to play at concerts and music shows around the world to practice their material and create a buzz before coming back to the States to make it big.
Your comment about "getting first hand treatment" is common, but misguided. Its not OUR fault. Its the record companies' fault. They want to make profit. Thats why they have bands play 3-4 shows in New York, Chicago, L.A. etc. and only 1-2 shows in London, Paris, etc. You also have to take into consideration the amount of people that live in America. There is a much larger concentration of population in New York, Chicago, and L.A. as opposed to London, Paris, Berlin, etc. Its a numbers game...not OUR fault.
Your other comment about "U2 already being big and not needing America" is also naive. Go read any of their books and you'll understand the importance of America...specifically Boston and New York in the development of U2's career. Not to mention the influence of American Blues and Early Rock music to their music catalog. Now tell me if America is not important to U2.
Again, we can go back and forth on this...but the truth remains. You can become a big band in Europe or Australia or Asia or Africa or wherever. But until you make it big in America you aren't considered to have hit the top. American Music styles influence the music across the world. Its been like that for years.
Sure America is important, but not as important as some people here make it out to be.
I can't see the problem a lot of people have with U2 starting their tour out in europe and then doing a US leg. Why does the US need to be the first leg? If the people in the US have forgotten U2 when the 2nd leg comes around then i suppose their not real fans anyway. And speaking about profit, i got this out of a thread from the Vertigo tour section and looking at that U2 actually made more profit from their Europe leg. They made 155 million profit compared to 139 million on 2 U2 legs. And i bet that if U2 would consider another Europe leg (maybe just 2 shows a city then as a max) then they could have made even more profit.
And as i have read so many times the 1st leg is considered as a "warm up leg". So why not be happy that maybe now the US will get the 2nd leg of the tour?
PowerSurge is correct, as usual.
we have the only Musician/General Manager in sports:
Americans think that America is more important than Europe. Europeans think that, because Bush fucked over the world, America should be permanently deprive of U2's presence.
Why do I need to read this thread to find that out?
People in one continent are going to think that their continent is better than the other (between Europe and America). It's kinda pointless to have a debate about this.
Again, we can go back and forth on this...but the truth remains. You can become a big band in Europe or Australia or Asia or Africa or wherever. But until you make it big in America you aren't considered to have hit the top. American Music styles influence the music across the world. Its been like that for years.
But EVERYONE knows the UK is the center of the Music universe!
I'll get my coat...........
hahaha!
no, no.....stay a while
maybe this will help?
UK/Ireland = U2, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Oasis, The Smiths, Joy Division, Sex Pistols, David Bowie, Queen, Radiohead
Nuff said
Any ideas on the tech that will be used this time out?
UK/Ireland = U2, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Oasis, The Smiths, Joy Division, Sex Pistols, David Bowie, Queen, Radiohead
Nuff said
US/Canada = All the artists who influenced those UK/I artists
Yeah, but I kid, both areas have great artists, trying to compare them is silly.
And since when do U2's families live in the US?
a US university? how was this confirmed?