Jive Turkey
ONE love, blood, life
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,645
Jackson said his nude children photo books (PLURAL) were art and that he had the right to own them. Which is fine on its own, but combined with everything else? Fairly damning.
See, I dont quite agree with that. Its either child porn or its not. We dont even know what the images were of. For all we know it could've been cutesy Anne Geddes style baby pictures. The guy obviously had a weird affinity towards children, theres no denying that, and owning these books was probably an extension of that. Its strange. If you owned a bunch of those books, I'd think you were a weirdo. I just dont think he had alternative motives to hanging out with kids. He just seemed like a strange guy who didnt fit in with social norms. Doesnt automatically make him a pedophile. then again, I didnt know the man and could be completely wrong