"it's perfectly reasonable to reject a candidate on his religious views." - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-17-2007, 03:54 PM   #1
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,488
Local Time: 05:36 PM
"it's perfectly reasonable to reject a candidate on his religious views."

i can't not giggle ...



[q]This Is Not a Test
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Monday, Dec. 17, 2007, at 12:03 PM ET

Just before this gets completely out of hand and becomes a mantralike repetition, let us please recall what the careful phrases of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution actually and very carefully and deliberately say:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

As so often, the framers and founding fathers meant what they said, said what they meant, and risked no waste of words. A candidate for election, or an applicant for a post in the bureaucracy, could not be disqualified on the grounds of his personal faith in any god (or his disbelief in any god, for that matter). This stipulation was designed to put an end to the hideous practice of European monarchies—and the pre-existing practice of various American colonies—whereby if a man did not affirm the trinity, or deny the pope, or abjure Judaism (depending on the jurisdiction), he could be forbidden to hold office or even to run for it. Along with the establishment clause of the First Amendment, and the predecessor-language of the Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom, it forms part of the chief glory of the first-ever constitution that guaranteed religious liberty, religious pluralism, and the freedom to be left alone by priests and rabbis and mullahs and other characters.

However, what Article VI does not do, and was never intended to do, is deny me the right to say, as loudly as I may choose, that I will on no account vote for a smirking hick like Mike Huckabee, who is an unusually stupid primate but who does not have the elementary intelligence to recognize the fact that this is what he is. My right to say and believe that is already guaranteed to me by the First Amendment. And the right of Huckabee to win the election and fill the White House with morons like himself is unaffected by my expression of an opinion.

So, can we please have less of this deliberate misunderstanding of Article VI, which, if it goes much further, will actually seem to prevent or even to criminalize any criticism of theocratic candidates for high office. I ask you now, does it seem likely that any article of the U.S. Constitution was specially written so that you could not publicly and freely and fearlessly say that you would most decidedly not vote for:

* A candidate who followed the "Rev." Jim Jones to a Kool-Aid resort in Guyana (don't forget that this did actually happen)
* A candidate who said that the pope could excommunicate other American candidates with whom he disagreed
* A candidate who said that the above-mentioned pope was the Antichrist
* A candidate who said that L. Ron Hubbard was a visionary
* A candidate who said that Joseph Smith was a visionary
* A candidate who said that any holy book was scripturally inerrant
* A candidate who was a member of Hezbollah or the Muslim Brotherhood or the Nation of Islam
* A candidate who was a supporter or member of the Orange Order or the Ulster Unionist Party
* A candidate who was a supporter or member of Opus Dei or the Phalange Party
* A candidate who was a supporter or member of Lehi or the Jewish Defense League
* A candidate who was a member of the Aryan Nations, the KKK, or any other white Protestant "Christian Identity" faction
* A candidate who said that the Quran was dictated by the archangel Gabriel

The above list is not exhaustive. But, in merely saying that an adherent of any such belief would certainly influence my vote and also be sure to sway it negatively, I myself apply no "religious test." To do that, I would have to be a legislator or policeman who was urging or upholding an alteration in the law of the land. And, as previously noticed, I would have to demand, and get, an amendment to the Constitution in order to bring this about. To put this simply enough, if I turn to a JDL fanatic and tell him that I will not cast my vote for him, and he responds by saying that I am deciding my vote on the unfair basis that he is a Jew, he is welcome to the meager consolation that this may afford him, but he is legally entitled—as am I—to fight another day.

Isn't it amazing how self-pitying and self-aggrandizing the religious freaks in this country are? It's not enough that they can make straight-faced professions of "faith" at election times and impose their language on everything from the Pledge of Allegiance to the currency. It's not enough that they can claim tax exemption and even subsidy for anything "faith-based." It's that when they are even slightly criticized for their absurd opinions, they can squeal as if being martyred and act as if they are truly being persecuted.

In a breathtaking profile of Huckabee published in the Dec. 16 New York Times Magazine, we read under the byline of Zev Chafets the following euphemistic drivel:

[q] Nowadays, Huckabee has more policy positions, but his campaign is really all about his Christian character. His slogan is "Faith, Family, Freedom," which Huckabee, who was once public-relations man for the Texas televangelist James Robison, wrote himself. Huckabee is no theocrat. He simply believes in the power of the Christian message, and in his ability to embody and deliver it. "It's not that we want to impose our religion on somebody," he wrote in Character Makes a Difference, a book first published in 1997 (as Character Is the Issue) and reissued earlier this year. "It's that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value."[/q]

Nice work, no? Can it really be true that "no theocrat" Huckabee wrote that whole slogan all by himself? While you ponder this massively impressive claim, I suggest that you look up the life and times of "the Texas televangelist James Robison" and ask yourself if, in voting against him or his smarmy underling, you would be acting or thinking unconstitutionally.

Awarding his subject a prize for performing the same cheap media trick that he has just performed himself, Chafets (who might also be described as a former public-relations man, but this time for Jerry Falwell's old friend and patron Menachem Begin) concludes by asserting that "Huckabee has become a master at disarming secular audiences." This big fat lie becomes a slender and wispy half-truth only if enough fools can be brought to believe it. One of the ways the propaganda trick is pulled is to insinuate, and to keep on insinuating, that it is the enemies of religious intolerance who are themselves the intolerant ones. That's the way to undermine, and eventually to demolish, the wall of separation.[/q]
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 12-17-2007, 03:57 PM   #2
Breakdancing Soul Pilgrim
 
UberBeaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the most serious...douch hammer ever
Posts: 20,318
Local Time: 05:36 PM
Is the American Christian Right the Christian Taliban?
__________________

__________________
UberBeaver is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 03:59 PM   #3
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,335
Local Time: 02:36 PM
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 05:16 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,267
Local Time: 04:36 PM
Quote:
Isn't it amazing how self-pitying and self-aggrandizing the religious freaks in this country are? It's not enough that they can make straight-faced professions of "faith" at election times and impose their language on everything from the Pledge of Allegiance to the currency. It's not enough that they can claim tax exemption and even subsidy for anything "faith-based." It's that when they are even slightly criticized for their absurd opinions, they can squeal as if being martyred and act as if they are truly being persecuted.
That's very sadly true of some religious people I've come across. There was a girl I talked to recently who complained about things like bumper stickers that make fun of Christians. Seriously? Of all the potential threats to your faith out there, some of which are actually valid and worth being concerned about, you're worried about and offended by bumper sticker quotes?

Quote:
"It's not that we want to impose our religion on somebody," he wrote in Character Makes a Difference, a book first published in 1997 (as Character Is the Issue) and reissued earlier this year. "It's that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value."
*Opens mouth. Closes it. Opens it again*

Wow...

Angela
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is online now  
Old 12-17-2007, 05:54 PM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 11:36 PM
"It's not that we want to impose our religion on somebody, it's that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value."

"It's not that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value, It's that we want to impose our religion on somebody."

It's interchangeable.
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 06:42 PM   #6
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,429
Local Time: 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Vincent Vega
"It's not that we want to impose our religion on somebody, it's that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value."
Swap out "religion" with whatever word you'd like -- everyone from GLAAD to the Ku Klux Klan has a worldview they believe has value. What movement/organization doesn't?
__________________
nathan1977 is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 07:01 PM   #7
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 11:36 PM
The President of the United States is not an organisation, as is not any other person holding any office or seat in the political field.
Religious worldviews among others are not worldviews that directly belong into politics. This is not to say a President may not have them or live in denial of his views while being in office, but this sentence screams of saying that he wants to make his politics in the way he before has led his prayers, i.e. translating his believes into his political actions as President.

The Republican party is not an organisation or movement the way GLAAD or the KKK are, and the President is neither.
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 07:29 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,429
Local Time: 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Vincent Vega
this sentence screams of saying that he wants to make his politics in the way he before has led his prayers, i.e. translating his believes into his political actions as President.
Didn't he write that sentence back in 1997?
__________________
nathan1977 is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 10:14 PM   #9
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,488
Local Time: 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by nathan1977


Swap out "religion" with whatever word you'd like -- everyone from GLAAD to the Ku Klux Klan has a worldview they believe has value. What movement/organization doesn't?


how all encompassing is the GLAAD worldview? are they concerned with souls? do they believe they answer only to someone infallible? do they posit connection to the infinite? do they tell others precisely how they should live?
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 12-17-2007, 11:59 PM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Bono's shades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 5,038
Local Time: 05:36 PM
Nowadays, Huckabee has more policy positions, but his campaign is really all about his Christian character. His slogan is "Faith, Family, Freedom," which Huckabee, who was once public-relations man for the Texas televangelist James Robison, wrote himself. Huckabee is no theocrat. He simply believes in the power of the Christian message, and in his ability to embody and deliver it. "It's not that we want to impose our religion on somebody," he wrote in Character Makes a Difference, a book first published in 1997 (as Character Is the Issue) and reissued earlier this year. "It's that we want to shape the culture and laws by using a worldview we believe has value."

So Huckabee admits he wants to have U.S. law reflect Christian views, but he has no theocratic tendencies whatsoever? And here I thought the New York Times hired smart people to write for them. Silly me.
__________________
Bono's shades is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 12:00 AM   #11
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,335
Local Time: 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Bono's shades
And here I thought the New York Times hired smart people to write for them. Silly me.
No, silly, the New York Times hires liberal bastards to write for them.


Isn't it obvious from this article?
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 12:03 AM   #12
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2democrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: England by way of 'Murica.
Posts: 22,140
Local Time: 10:36 PM
Meh, I don't really like Hitchens, I find him to be on the opposite end of the spectrum from the religious fundamentalists

He does occasionally raise good points though.
__________________
U2democrat is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 08:24 AM   #13
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auto Dafoe
Posts: 9,600
Local Time: 08:36 AM
I pray God (yes, ironic) that this sort of nonsense never gets its claws into Australian politics any further than the so far negligible extent that it has.

By which I simply refer to that whole hand-on-your-heart Jesus thing. It's simply bullshit as regards judging the qualities of someone who will be required to plumb the depths of depravity as part of their future leadership of an empire in decline.

Anyone can tell you they love Jesus. Anyone. Talk is easy.
__________________
Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 02:08 PM   #14
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by nathan1977


Didn't he write that sentence back in 1997?
Did he seem to have changed in the previous ten years? As far as I've heard about him it seems no. This very much seems to be part of what he is aiming for in his Presidency, and that sentence really is just a cheap try to say the first part of the sentence in different words hoping to have some falling for it.
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 02:11 PM   #15
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,488
Local Time: 05:36 PM
it is amazing to me how much more overtly religious Huckabee is than even GWB. gosh, in comparison, at least on this issue, GWB looks like a model of Goldwaterian restrain.

shows how badly we've regressed these past 7 years.
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com