Is Palin failin' ? or OMG McCain wins with Palin !! pt. 2 - Page 47 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-12-2008, 02:00 PM   #691
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
If Russia was determined to they could indeed march into Kiev,

but they're not. there's no reason for it. the costs would be enormous. Russia is not the Soviet Union, it is not the reconstituting Russian Empire.

it's an autocratic petro-state that isn't stupid.

it must be dealt with by someone who understands the world, understands nuance, is calm, cool, collected, who isn't going to think Putin's a swell guy because he wears a cross the first time he meets a gullible born-again like Bush, and by someone who doesn't write hysterical op-eds the day after Russia throws some of it's weight around.

or maybe you'd prefer to invoke the Bush Doctrine here and take care of Russia before they can threaten and dominate the world's oil supplies. you might be right in that Putin is a threat to global peace and a threat to his neighbors and region. how many WMDs does Russia have that are unaccounted for?

there is no other choice but to invade Russia and overthrow Putin and bring democracy to Russia. it wouldn’t cost us much. they’ve got enough oil to pay for their own reconstruction. and i'm sure we’d probably be greeted as liberators. i bet it would be a cakewalk.
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:13 PM   #692
ONE
love, blood, life
 
financeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
I was taken aback by this ad by a 527.

Showed it to my 59 year old father, who has hunted throughout his life. His first response was "shooting animals from planes in the snow isn't hunting" and his second was "this woman is sick." Then he said he was going to walk his beloved dog.

YouTube - Brutal
I remember when Cheney almost murdered someone while on a hunt a few years back, a number of real hunters pointed out that the activity Cheney and his group was engaged in wasn't proper hunting, it was basically a duck shoot where even someone with no co-ordination at all will bag likely a few dozen birds.

I honestly think neo-conservatism is a pathological or psychopathic disorder of some sort, a lot of these neo-con types are literally criminal psychopaths and seem to revel in activities such as killing animals, invading small countries, etc.
__________________

__________________
financeguy is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:16 PM   #693
Refugee
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
but they're not. there's no reason for it. the costs would be enormous. Russia is not the Soviet Union, it is not the reconstituting Russian Empire.

it's an autocratic petro-state that isn't stupid.

it must be dealt with by someone who understands the world, understands nuance, is calm, cool, collected, who isn't going to think Putin's a swell guy because he wears a cross the first time he meets a gullible born-again like Bush, and by someone who doesn't write hysterical op-eds the day after Russia throws some of it's weight around.
Ironically, the whole reason why Biden is on the ticket is because Obama clearly does not get it when it comes to Russia. The events in Georgia over the past 3 months have proven McCain's stance on Russia to be correct.

Oh, and your point earlier was not that the Russian's would not march into Kiev, but that they couldn't even if they tried. It is open to debate whether or not Russia under their current leadership wants to reimpose control on states of the former Soviet Union and rebuild the Russian Empire. Ukraine has looked at this national security question and has decided that they need to get into NATO as soon as possible. All of the Eastern European countries are united in supporting Ukraine and Georgia's membership into NATO.

Everyone in the NATO alliance recognizes that Russia still poses a threat to Europe and the only thing that is stupid is to ignore that and not prepare for it. The likely hood of Russian expansionism will drop if the US and NATO remain firm and don't attempt to appease Russia by letting it have some special sphere of influence in regards to the independent countries of the former Soviet Union.
__________________
Strongbow is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:21 PM   #694
ONE
love, blood, life
 
financeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongbow View Post
Ironically, the whole reason why Biden is on the ticket is because Obama clearly does not get it when it comes to Russia. The events in Georgia over the past 3 months have proven McCain's stance on Russia to be correct.
Most serious observers believe that Georgia was the aggressor.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongbow View Post
Everyone in the NATO alliance recognizes that Russia still poses a threat to Europe and the only thing that is stupid is to ignore that and not prepare for it. The likely hood of Russian expansionism will drop if the US and NATO remain firm and don't attempt to appease Russia by letting it have some special sphere of influence in regards to the independent countries of the former Soviet Union.


Russia already has a sphere of influence in that part of the world, and the whole 'US as world policeman meme' is a busted flush. You might as well accustom yourself to these basic facts, as they ain't changing any time soon.
__________________
financeguy is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:42 PM   #695
Refugee
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by financeguy View Post
Most serious observers believe that Georgia was the aggressor.
Name a few who are not anti-NATO expansion, Putin Appeasers, or Russians.

Plus if you take a look at Russian military activity before the conflict, that tells you everything you need to know about who is really responsible.

Quote:
Russia already has a sphere of influence in that part of the world, and the whole 'US as world policeman meme' is a busted flush. You might as well accustom yourself to these basic facts, as they ain't changing any time soon.
No one here is talking about the United States being a world policeman. NATO does not accept any sort of Russian sphere of influence in which they dominate and control what are supposed to be independent and democratic countries.

Estonia, Latvia, and Luthunia, former Soviet Republics are already in NATO. NATO expansion has been the reality now for over a decade. Its about time Russia woke up to this reality and accepted it.
__________________
Strongbow is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:19 PM   #696
ONE
love, blood, life
 
namkcuR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 10,290
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Re: The Bush Doctrine, since Palin couldn't give a good answer...

To this day it amazes me the number of people who either don't see or don't care about the ethical questions and implications that arise from the concept of 'preventative war'.

I am reminded of the film Minority Report, about a futuristic pre-crime system in which three pseudo-comatose humans have the gift of pre-cognition and can see crimes before they are committed, and the images they see in their head are transfered to cops, who then go and arrest the person in question before a crime is committed. The film centers around the ethical question of whether or not it is ok to arrest someone for a crime they haven't committed, just because you're almost certain they were going to.

It applies here. Despite all of the things Saddam was doing to his own people, he, and Iraq, never did anything to us to warrant an invasion. Therefore, there is a serious ethical question about the merits of invading a country that hasn't done anything to you. That doesn't mean you ignore it. You keep a close eye on their activities, you give special importance to any intelligence you get regarding the region(you know, instead of ignoring a briefing entitled, 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.'), you be prepared to defend yourself should they try anything, and even be prepared to retaliate in the event that they succeed with anything and if there is absolutely no other course of action to take. But don't go invading them before they've done anything.

No, I think the Bush Doctrine is reactionary, reckless, and fear-based.
__________________
namkcuR is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:21 PM   #697
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,237
Local Time: 10:02 AM
I also find it quite interesting that when faced with a question she didn't quite understand, the default is to basically back Bush 100%.

And here I thought she and McCain were campaigning for change in Washington...
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:51 PM   #698
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 11:02 AM
not to worry! for all the fretting that's going on over how Palin has embarrassed herself in the Charlie Gibson interview, damage control has already begun.

Ms. Palin will do her next interview with this guy:

__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 04:02 PM   #699
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,237
Local Time: 10:02 AM
Oh goody. Get ready for some hard hitting, probing journalism.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 04:10 PM   #700
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 05:02 PM
IMO, that Defenders of Wildlife ad doesn't really mean very much without more info on ratios of wolves and bears to moose and caribou in the areas where the aerial gunning was carried out. It's illegal under federal law to shoot animals from planes for sport; they permit it only where the state in question has determined predator control measures are called for in specific area(s), and the shooting must be done by either state employees or licensed hunters who've been granted special permits for the purpose. Of course none of that automatically makes the Alaska measures in question unproblematic; again, you'd need to see data on predator-prey population ratios in the relevant areas, as well as on what percentages of moose and caribou are killed by wolves and bears as opposed to humans (e.g., are wolves being given a reasonable chance to compete with humans for caribou, or are we talking an egregious sop to hunters where wolf populations are being kept at near-endangerment levels to keep hunting-expedition businesses happy?).

At any rate I doubt this will be a major issue with many voters.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 04:17 PM   #701
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemen View Post
Oh goody. Get ready for some hard hitting, probing journalism.

it will be interesting ... who will be more smug? who will be more self-satisfied? i'm pretty sure that it's going to be the viewer who is left unsatisfied by what is sure to be a Republican mutual masturbation session.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 04:36 PM   #702
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemen View Post
I also find it quite interesting that when faced with a question she didn't quite understand, the default is to basically back Bush 100%.

And here I thought she and McCain were campaigning for change in Washington...
At the end of the day, all three still have the letter "R" next to their name.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 04:47 PM   #703
Breakdancing Soul Pilgrim
 
UberBeaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the most serious...douch hammer ever
Posts: 20,318
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by financeguy View Post
I honestly think neo-conservatism is a pathological or psychopathic disorder of some sort, a lot of these neo-con types are literally criminal psychopaths and seem to revel in activities such as killing animals, invading small countries, etc.
lol. To me it's just a narcissistic utter disregard for anything that does not benefit their wallets and/or status.
__________________
UberBeaver is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 05:02 PM   #704
Blue Crack Supplier
 
dazzledbylight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the sound dancing - w Bono & Edge :D
Posts: 33,002
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
I was taken aback by this ad by a 527.

Showed it to my 59 year old father, who has hunted throughout his life. His first response was "shooting animals from planes in the snow isn't hunting" and his second was "this woman is sick." Then he said he was going to walk his beloved dog.

Ohooo, THAT'S what that's about........ I hadn't paid the closest attention to that part of her beliefs (vs other things).

UGH...... that's a relative slaughter, not a hunt.


Wolfs can be a problem in some cases, but they are an amazing social animal society.
__________________
dazzledbylight is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 05:03 PM   #705
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yolland View Post
IMO, that Defenders of Wildlife ad doesn't really mean very much without more info on ratios of wolves and bears to moose and caribou in the areas where the aerial gunning was carried out. It's illegal under federal law to shoot animals from planes for sport; they permit it only where the state in question has determined predator control measures are called for in specific area(s), and the shooting must be done by either state employees or licensed hunters who've been granted special permits for the purpose. Of course none of that automatically makes the Alaska measures in question unproblematic; again, you'd need to see data on predator-prey population ratios in the relevant areas, as well as on what percentages of moose and caribou are killed by wolves and bears as opposed to humans (e.g., are wolves being given a reasonable chance to compete with humans for caribou, or are we talking an egregious sop to hunters where wolf populations are being kept at near-endangerment levels to keep hunting-expedition businesses happy?).

At any rate I doubt this will be a major issue with many voters.
My understanding is that there was a wolf problem. I do not currently have the brain capacity to follow up on this.
__________________

__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com