redhotswami said:yay!
now if we can just get the u.s. to do the same thing...
Justin24 said:
Will never happen and I am fine with this.
Justin24 said:
and I am fine with this.
BonoVoxSupastar said:You listened to too many Reagan theories.
Justin24 said:
Do you think the world would honestly be safe with out nukes?
redhotswami said:i dont understand why people are so afraid of each other. honestly, if there's open communication and put and end to poverty, and there wouldn't be so much violence.
Justin24 said:
Not true because people alway desire power, which is stronger than any nuke.
redhotswami said:
safe from what??? what is it you're so afraid of?
anitram said:So the world is safe with nukes?
LOL.
verte76 said:Huh, nukes are supposed to make us safe?
Justin24 said:
Do you think the world would honestly be safe with out nukes?
Justin24 said:
I am not afraid of anything (well ferriswheels).
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Hell fucking yes. It would be a lot safer.
It's a no brainer.
Justin24 said:
Really, so what was it last month over 1000 dead from suicide bombing in iraq. How many hundreds of thousand died in Rwanda......... Over 800,0000 (More than Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and you call that safe?
toscano said:Like it or not, nukes keep the would-be superpowers in a state of relative peace.
Unlike in 1914 or 1939 (or other times in the early 20th century if you look at the Japan/China/Russia conflicts), no one will dare start an all out war with any nuke-capable country nowadays.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
This is such a backwards theory. Have we not been attacked? If and when war breaks out which war would have less death, the one with or without nukes?