2016 US Presidential Election Pt. III - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-18-2015, 04:58 PM   #16
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,386
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluer White View Post
How does it work ?

You get your own server, your own domain, your own certificate/encryption, your own staff knowing the Clintons... it's not like she signed into her hotmail account and sent emails. She had a highly sophisticated system set up in her house. The level of protection it has or had is indicative of the level of security the Clintons provided for it when they set it up/when they maintain it. It could be more secure than a government system. It could be less secure. I don't think anyone has talked about the level of security provided on the system.
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline  
Old 09-18-2015, 10:35 PM   #17
Refugee
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,886
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
I don't think anyone has talked about the level of security provided on the system.
Awhile ago I read that a former State tech employee was privately hired by Mrs. Clinton. Recently he chose to plead the Fifth Amendment.

I wonder if the gentleman could tell us about the secure private server he helped set up and maintain for Secretary of State Clinton.
__________________

__________________
Bluer White is offline  
Old 09-18-2015, 10:53 PM   #18
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,386
Local Time: 02:56 PM
What's your point? It's a matter of what we "don't know" at the moment.

It's not as simple as saying the server was assumed insecure until proven otherwise. There's no assumption to be had. It's a bizarre situation. I'm not defending her... I don't even like her. Objectively speaking, what she did was wrong. But objectively speaking, we have zero gauge for the severity of her actions.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline  
Old 09-18-2015, 11:38 PM   #19
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluer White View Post
Awhile ago I read that a former State tech employee was privately hired by Mrs. Clinton. Recently he chose to plead the Fifth Amendment.



I wonder if the gentleman could tell us about the secure private server he helped set up and maintain for Secretary of State Clinton.


Were you just some IT guy, would you not also plead the 5th? Regardless of what you'd actually done or had been asked to do.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 10:46 AM   #20
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mrs. Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: pig farming in Bolivia
Posts: 7,221
Local Time: 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
I'd also argue that Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee are pretty fucking stupid.

Fellows like Jeb Bush and Ben Carson are not stupid by any means.
While i cannot fucking stand Ted Cruz, the man is not stupid by any means. His supporters might be a different story however...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluer White View Post
How does it work ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
You get your own server, your own domain, your own certificate/encryption, your own staff knowing the Clintons... it's not like she signed into her hotmail account and sent emails. She had a highly sophisticated system set up in her house. The level of protection it has or had is indicative of the level of security the Clintons provided for it when they set it up/when they maintain it. It could be more secure than a government system. It could be less secure. I don't think anyone has talked about the level of security provided on the system.
The truth is, you don't know, nobody knows...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluer White View Post
Awhile ago I read that a former State tech employee was privately hired by Mrs. Clinton. Recently he chose to plead the Fifth Amendment.

I wonder if the gentleman could tell us about the secure private server he helped set up and maintain for Secretary of State Clinton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
What's your point? It's a matter of what we "don't know" at the moment.

It's not as simple as saying the server was assumed insecure until proven otherwise. There's no assumption to be had. It's a bizarre situation. I'm not defending her... I don't even like her. Objectively speaking, what she did was wrong. But objectively speaking, we have zero gauge for the severity of her actions.
Not so fast. I do like her, but the truth is at every level of Govt we are taught the importance of safeguarding classified information. It is one of the things you will hear about constantly. So "if" her system wasn't secure that's a pretty big deal. "If" she was indeed sending classified information from her private server, that's a huge deal, as in she broke laws that normal people would be locked up for a long long time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Were you just some IT guy, would you not also plead the 5th? Regardless of what you'd actually done or had been asked to do.
Hell yes! I think the people deserve to know the truth though...
__________________
Mrs. Garrison is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 01:36 PM   #21
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,386
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrison View Post
Not so fast. I do like her, but the truth is at every level of Govt we are taught the importance of safeguarding classified information. It is one of the things you will hear about constantly. So "if" her system wasn't secure that's a pretty big deal. "If" she was indeed sending classified information from her private server, that's a huge deal, as in she broke laws that normal people would be locked up for a long long time
What does your liking of her hand to do with my comment? And not so fast on what? There seems to be only minor differences in what you're saying and what I'm saying. But you're talking about something totally different. I'm talking about blasting her for "handing over her emails to Iran and Russia" or whatever. There's no basis for making such a claim.

And I currently work for the U.S. Government as well
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 02:33 PM   #22
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: southwest USA
Posts: 3,302
Local Time: 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
And I currently work for the U.S. Government as well

This explains it all.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
bobsaget77 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 03:32 PM   #23
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,386
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsaget77 View Post
This explains it all.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Care to go into detail? Because you sort of just sound ignorant at the moment.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 03:49 PM   #24
Refugee
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,886
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Were you just some IT guy, would you not also plead the 5th? Regardless of what you'd actually done or had been asked to do.
In this case, Absolutely I would!
__________________
Bluer White is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 04:42 PM   #25
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsaget77 View Post
This explains it all.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference



Do tell.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 05:05 PM   #26
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsaget77 View Post


Sent from my iPhone .....
this is quite telling
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 05:33 PM   #27
Refugee
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,886
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrison View Post
Not so fast. I do like her, but the truth is at every level of Govt we are taught the importance of safeguarding classified information. It is one of the things you will hear about constantly. So "if" her system wasn't secure that's a pretty big deal. "If" she was indeed sending classified information from her private server, that's a huge deal, as in she broke laws that normal people would be locked up for a long long time.
The security of her whole operation and all the tech talk and the criminal liability questions are interesting.

More interesting to me is *WHY* our Secretary of State did this.
__________________
Bluer White is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 06:09 PM   #28
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: southwest USA
Posts: 3,302
Local Time: 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
Care to go into detail? Because you sort of just sound ignorant at the moment.

The government is a greedy piglet that suckles on a taxpayer’s teet until they have sore, chapped nipples.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
bobsaget77 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 06:26 PM   #29
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,386
Local Time: 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsaget77 View Post
The government is a greedy piglet that suckles on a taxpayer’s teet until they have sore, chapped nipples.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

1) you don't know what I do for the government, or what establishment I work for
2) that has absolutely zero to do me talking about Hillary Clinton's email sever (the post you quoted, remember?)
3) way to quote something out of context
4) your comment still doesn't make sense. WHAT does it supposedly explain? Nothing has been explained. Two different people arguing two different sides of the story both work for the government. Your point?
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline  
Old 09-19-2015, 10:55 PM   #30
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluer White View Post
The security of her whole operation and all the tech talk and the criminal liability questions are interesting.



More interesting to me is *WHY* our Secretary of State did this.

The same reason Powell and Rice did the same thing. Where was the WHY then? Where was the right wing concern then?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com