Hewson
Blue Crack Supplier
ManJudas will be looking for work in January...and nobody will hire him.Headache in a Suitcase said:
Hope he looks good in an orange apron.
ManJudas will be looking for work in January...and nobody will hire him.Headache in a Suitcase said:
phanan said:Anyone else love how the media is going into overkill drive about how the Patriots are "running up the score"?
Perhaps the Redskins should have stopped Matt Cassel instead...
Hewson said:ManJudas will be looking for work in January...and nobody will hire him.
Hope he looks good in an orange apron.
Headache in a Suitcase said:
yes, well... he did that to himself with his whole selling out of belichick thing.
i'm sure the rest of the league is thrilled that mangenius pissed the pats off after the first game of the season.
Correct...coaches view kicking a gimme FG in that situation as running it up, not running the ball.Dalton said:I disagree with that LM, they could have kicked a field goal there and taken certain points. They gave the skins defense a chance to stop them w/o any points - they didn't.
I say the spread will be over 20, and I say give give give.CTU2fan said:
Speaking of the Mangenius, you don't suppose there'll be any running up of the score when the J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS visit Foxboro in week 14 do you?
Hewson said:Correct...coaches view kicking a gimme FG in that situation as running it up, not running the ball.
CTU2fan said:I'm thinking Colvin should have just taken a knee rather than running that fumble in for a TD. Maybe the NFL should institute a mercy rule, so grown men won't have their feelings hurt. The Pats had backups all over the field throughout the 4th quarter, why not let those guys play? If you can't even stop the NE backups from scoring your problems run a bit deeper than how many points you give up in one game.
STFU already. Stop somebody. This ain't Pop Warner. And it's funny, the teams that are crying the most about this (Skins, Dolphins, Cowboys) have been as guilty as anyone of running it up in the past. Funny how I'm hearing all this "what goes around comes around/you reap what you sow" business from media types...where were they when the whole NFL ran it up against New England for like 10 years straight? Damn right what goes around comes around, and it's coming around now.
Of course this all comes from the media's hate of Belichick...he doesn't kiss their asses/let them read his playbook/put on a Parcells-esque show in press conferences. But it's still irritatinig. This team is putting together a historically great run here, and it's being dragged down by this trivial shit. It's looking like Pats against the world all over again, just what Belichick always wants. Stupid media, they hate the guy so much, but they play right into his hands.
BEAL said:Just a question here because of all the BB and Parcells name being mentioned.
Do you think Parcells wins his Super Bowls, or even takes his teams to the Super Bowl / Championship games without BB as his assistant coach (and Def Cord)????
I kind of wonder if Parcells is just a little overrated (along with Ditka), and it's really been BB that has carried those teams.
LemonMelon said:
Belichick's regular season coaching record (Patriots included): 119-81 (0.595)
Record coaching the Browns: 37-45
Record coaching the Patriots before Brady (2000 season): 5-11
Record coaching the Patriots with Brady (2001 season): 11-5
Total record before Brady: 42-56
Total record with Brady: 90-28
Hewson said:
Whats his playoff record?
Hewson said:Wow you edited the "He's not that good" out just as I went to quote it.
Whats his playoff record?
This is comical because until this year, the argument has a;ways been Brady is not that good, just a product of Belichic' system...so suddenly Belichick's sytem stinks but Brady makes it work.LemonMelon said:
Without Brady, Belichick would be nothing.
DaveC said:
Look at the numbers. He wouldn't even BE in the playoffs if it wasn't for Brady.
You, my friend, have just made a moot point.
Hewson said:This is comical because until this year, the argument has a;ways been Brady is not that good, just a product of Belichic' system...so suddenly Belichick's sytem stinks but Brady makes it work.
Dude, they hung a 52-7 pounding on your Skins...don't be like Patrick Crayton, slink away quietly like Carl Spackler instead.
Actually it seems more like...arguments change conveniently to support your side, better known as:DaveC said:"Arguments" change. It's a big part of something called "the scientific method". Conclusions are adjusted as observations of results become clearer.
I learned that in Grade 7.
Hewson said:Actually it seems more like...arguments change conveniently to support your side, better known as:
phillyfan26 said:I'm just going to say that I can't argue over bad coaching when I have to watch Andy Reid every week. Pretty much every other coach looks like a fucking genius after following the Eagles for the past nine years.
phillyfan26 said:I'm just going to say that I can't argue over bad coaching when I have to watch Andy Reid every week. Pretty much every other coach looks like a fucking genius after following the Eagles for the past nine years.