I Want Some Sugar!

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Here is whats gonna happen:

Polls:

1) USC
2) LSU
3) OKLAHOMA

BCS:

1) OKLAHOMA
2) LSU
3) USC

The winner of the OK-LSU will be the coaches #1 and USC will beat Michigan in the Rose bowl to get the AP #1.

Split champions is like smooching your sister.

BCS :down:
Playoffs :up:
 
from espn.com

Southern California's rise to No. 1 in the polls might not be enough to guarantee the Trojans a spot in the national championship game.


USC took over the top spot in the ESPN/USA Today coaches' poll released Sunday morning, a combination of its 52-28 victory over Oregon State on Saturday and previous No. 1 Oklahoma's humbling 35-7 loss to Kansas State in the Big 12 championship game.


However, the Sooners are expected to hold their No. 1 position in the final Bowl Championship Series when the final standings and BCS bowl matchups are announced today (5:30 p.m. ET, ABC). The Trojans' position -- they have been second to the Sooners for weeks -- was weakened due to losses by two of their opponents, Notre Dame and Hawaii, on Saturday.


That being the case, the door is open for LSU as Oklahoma's likely opponent in the Nokia Sugar Bowl. The Tigers routed Georgia 34-13 in the SEC championship game and have the upper BCS hand over USC, according to ESPN's Brad Edwards.


Saturday's turn of events will allow LSU to finish eight spots better than USC in schedule strength. LSU now will be able to overcome a one-point poll deficit to USC, as long as it leads the Trojans in at least six of the seven BCS computers, which is expected to happen, according to Edwards.


USC's only hope was to jump to No. 1 and hope Oklahoma fell to No. 2 in either the coaches' or The Associated Press media poll, according to Edwards. The Sooners fell to third in the coaches' poll, where LSU is second.


Since margin of victory is no longer a consideration in the BCS system, the Sooners will remain the top-ranked team in the majority of BCS ratings -- which in turn will enable them to stay in the top two of the BCS.




say goodnight to the bcs... if this does happen, and the #1 ranked team in the polls doesn't play for the national championship, they're going to have to get rid of the bcs as it currently stands. pete carroll gets the shaft again
 
Last edited:
LSU-USC SHOULD be the game, but it wont...


Oklahoma doesnt deserve to be in it- they didnt even win their coference.
 
If USC beats Michigan in the Rose Bowl (I've got to get tickets now) they will remain #1 in both the AP and Coaches polls. The Sugar Bowl just became irrelevant.
 
the coaches HAVE to vote the way the final BCS is ranked

so if USC wins it will be a split championship
 
its their own fault for losing to a not so good Cal team

miami of ohio only has 1 loss and their only loss was to Iowa, who is much better than Cal, thats just the way things go when you lose you leave it up to other factors
 
usc put auburn, byu and notre dame on their schedule... all of whom looked to be tough opponents before the season, turned out to be not so tough opponents durring the season, and playing these three ended up hurting usc's strength of schedule, giving lsu the slightest of bcs edges. i think there has to be a split in the strength of schedule section of the bcs... a pre-season strength of schedule ranking and a post-season strength of schedule ranking. that way usc doesn't get penalized because notre dame, who was a top 25 team when they were placed on so.cal's schedule, has a crappy year and doesn't finish over .500. usc tried to play a tougher schedule, but teams they selected didn't do as well as expected, and now they're penalized because of what someone else's team did. load of crap if ya ask me... we need a playoff system... 4 teams, 6 teams, whatever... it needs to be done. let the best team win, and let the teams decided their own destiny, not have it taken away from them because of the result of a meaningless game between two sub .500 teams in the carrier dome
 
Chizip said:
the coaches HAVE to vote the way the final BCS is ranked

so if USC wins it will be a split championship

Coaches should vote their conscience :angry:

There is a consensus #1 today - the BCS system, designed to create consensus, will only interfere with consensus.
 
Running up the score was a problem with teams like FSU

In a number of games, SC would pull starters by the end of the third quarter.

Playoff system is a good solution, but the money is against this solution. Currently, the $$$ from bowl games go to the schools/conferences. A playoff system would be controlled by the NCAA - no one wants to see the $$$ go there.
 
Headache in a Suitcase said:
if hawaii or notre dame had won saturday, usc would have gotten in... how is this a fair system, where what happens in a completely unrelated game decides who plays for the national championship game.

well that is actually one of the good things about the BCS, EVERY game counts

like i said, USC lost a game and only has itself to blame

there are 3 teams with 1 loss, LSU lost to a great Florida St. team, OU lost to a great K St team, and USC lost to a mediocre Cal team.
 
Chizip said:




there are 3 teams with 1 loss, LSU lost to a great Florida St. team, OU lost to a great K St team, and USC lost to a mediocre Cal team.

actually LSU lost to Florida 19-7 at home.

but i agree with you that every game counts and you defintely want the teams you beat to win the rest of their games.
 
It was reported a couple of weeks ago that Washington State's loss to Washington hurt SC's strenghth of schedule - even though SC beat both teams.

Every year they tinker with the computer, every year they risk another unsatisfying result.
 
Back
Top Bottom