Vox02
War Child
First Week:
US: 648.000
WW: 1.3-1.5 million
First Year
US: 1.9 million
WW: 7.8 million
Vox
US: 648.000
WW: 1.3-1.5 million
First Year
US: 1.9 million
WW: 7.8 million
Vox
You´re wrong. Rolling Stone magazine gave the album 5 stars and dubbed it a masterpiece. Nearly all the reviews I´ve read (and I´ve read a lot) gave the album at least 4 stars. This is indeed a great work. Maybe it´s too early to give a definite opinion but when all is said and done I guess it will make my Top 3, right up there with JT and AB.
Rolling Stone's review was great. But overall, the reviews are on par with or lower than those of HTDAAB. It will be interesting to see what the Meta Critic rating is for this album. HTDAAB got 79/100 and I suspect this album may be lower than that from what I have read. Yes, it's getting some great reviews from RS and Q magazine, but there have also been quite a few 3/5 or 3.5/5 ratings. They have been good, but the album is certainly not getting universal acclaim from critics overall.
I have also read a lot of the reaction from PEOPLE online, people posting on Amazon.com, Rolling Stone.com, RateYourMusic.com, SputnikMusic.com, etc and there's no doubt that so far the reaction has been mixed.
Right now on Sputnik, the album has an average rating of 3.2/5 and on RateYourMusic it has a 2.84/5. Obviously there are a lot of paranoid, crazed U2 haters out there and I fully expect these ratings to go UP, but I have read a lot of comments as well from longtime fans who just aren't getting in to this album. It's been divisive online so far.
So. I'm holding out for the album to be released before I listen to it so I can't really speak to how "accessible" it is. I will probably end up revising my estimates lower because the professional reviews have not equaled the enthusiasm on this site, and most people say that there are few radio friendly songs on the CD.
As far as Uk critics are concerned, the lowest rating I saw was 3 stars or 3 stars and a half. I agree that this album won´t appeal to the US (both critics and public) the same way the last two albums did.
Incidentally, three different reviews were published yesterday in US newspapers and they gave the album 3 stars on average. The funny thing is one would have expected a high rating from reading the contents of the articles. I mean, they were quite positive.
But could those reviews be based on a 4 star system instead of 5? 3 stars out of 4 is very good.
But could those reviews be based on a 4 star system instead of 5? 3 stars out of 4 is very good.
Good points.
Plus, remember, "masterpieces" are rarely recognized as being such at the time. And a lot of crap can sell boatloads. A "masterpiece" hardly means people will rush out to get it.
In 2000, I was all about ATYCLB doing well. Now, I'll be happy if U2 see "Zooropa" type numbers. Given illegal downloads, U2's age, the lack of super catchy songs, the fact that this is a true "album", etc., I don't think U2 will sell 4M copies of NLOTH in the U.S. (like ATYCLB did). But hopefully 2X Platinum in the U.S. and maybe 5-6M more worldwide.
Of course, would love more!
personally i think its too early for a new single. in the uk at least boots is still on high rotation on bbc radio, and to release a new single would either knock boots off prematurely or, delay the new singles airplay.
i was thinking about the japan release, hopefully we will see it chart on mediatraffic tomorrow, HTDAAB debuted with about 39k from Japan alone. that was #4 in japan i think.
U2 are cashing in on the huge pre-release exposure for their new album, with No Line On The Horizon outselling the rest of the Top 10 sellers combined on its first day on sale.
The Mercury-issued album sold 64,698 copies on Monday, according to retail reports, around four times as many units as its nearest challenger, The Prodigy’s Invaders Must Die. The Prodigy album debuted at number one last Sunday to give Cooking Vinyl its first ever chart-topping album.
U2’s new album, which was backed by the band occupying a series of promotional slots across the BBC last Friday, could be joined in the 20 this coming weekend by their 2006 retrospective U218 Singles. The best of, whose sales are up around 140% on the week, was ranked 39th on last Sunday’s chart, but is poised for a double-digit climb on the forthcoming countdown.
Best case scenario here:
Uk - 160k
Us - 420k
U2 BOOTS UP THE CHART
New Interscope Album To Bow at #1, 400-450k in Sales
March 4, 2009
All those TV appearances, all those award show performances, all those online retail deals paid off for U2, whose Interscope album, No Line on the Horizon, will debut at #1 next week, with a respectable, if not overwhelming, total between 400-450k.
That’s based on one-day sales reports from those retailers who still have their doors open, as well as the usual online suspects.
Credit a marketing component involving Starbucks and $3.99 downloads at AmazonMP3.com for helping the iconic Irish rockers, who now have their own street with their names on it in Manhattan, with the year’s best sales debut. Springsteen was the previous record-holder, with sales of 211k for his Working on a Dream album, which came out last month.
By comparison, U2’s last album, How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb, which came out in Nov. 2004, admittedly during the Q4 rush, sold 840k its first week out.
the new album will be a very weak seller. it won't outsell POP. that's my prediction. The thing about the classic U2 sound is that it's only for the fans. No new fans will get turned on to this.
hey, a fellow South AussieWell the fact that they are released at identical times of the year will provide a fair comparison, but just for the record, by the end of 1997 Pop sold 1.3 million in the US, and 5.5 million worldwide.
I know for a fact that NLOTH will beat the US figure for Pop, but worldwide sales are going to be tough to predict until we see how the album is holding up after a few weeks.