Kieran McConville
ONE love, blood, life
yes. Actually where we get them.
On an entirely unrelated note, it's local elections day here in Victoria and getting updates of the results is not entirely easy. Neither Fairfax nor News seem terribly interested in the outcome.
But disappointingly it looks like Melbourne's Lord Mayor, Robert Doyle of the Libs, has been re-elected.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...s-twitter-views-as-the-sun-gives-him-red-card
This is amusing as hell to me. You only need to not hate refugees and these rags will have it in for you.
On an entirely unrelated note, it's local elections day here in Victoria and getting updates of the results is not entirely easy. Neither Fairfax nor News seem terribly interested in the outcome.
But disappointingly it looks like Melbourne's Lord Mayor, Robert Doyle of the Libs, has been re-elected.
Hey, didn't he used to be the leader of the opposition or something?
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...s-twitter-views-as-the-sun-gives-him-red-card
This is amusing as hell to me. You only need to not hate refugees and these rags will have it in for you.
It's The Sun. You only need to not film yourself beating up refugees to get those guys on your case.
I suspect if you had been watching Leader's social media they would have been covering it live. But it's very hard for me to be enthused about them. I was in and out in 30 seconds, I took a Greens how-to-vote card and listed them 1,2,3 and then numbered the rest from top to bottom.
I guess all the small-l business liberals are in local and state government right now. The federal sphere seems to be the preserve of a more rarefied breed of kulturkamf mixed with an almost touching economic cargo cult.
Are the results up?! I can't make heads or tails of the VEC website
Axver's Bitchin' Facebook Account said:I have at least been cheered up a little today by the hilarity (and constitutional nerdiness) that is the situation of Bob Day, South Australian Senator for Family First, whose on-and-off resignation has been outpaced by the possibility his election was invalid in the first place.
I've tried to piece together some preliminary thoughts. Day appears to be ineligible to stand for election under section 44(v) of the constitution, which covers matters of pecuniary interest. The only possible precedent there is the case of Webster in 1975, where the court's judgement is widely criticised, would be revised, and is not very relevant. There are, however, precedents from section 44(i), which covers citizenship and ruled out Wood in 1988 and Hill in 1998. If Day is ineligible to be elected, his case is like those two. It is not a casual vacancy; rather he was not eligible to be elected, thus a recount excluding him is necessary.
I think Wood's case is more relevant than Hill's to understanding what might happen. Wood was the first candidate for the Nuclear Disarmament Party, which stood only two candidates. To be eligible for a box above the line, a party needs a minimum of two candidates, so with Wood not in the recount, what happened to the NDP's second? In that instance, the court ruled that this candidate could be included in the count as if they were a valid ticket. I'm not sure why this precedent would not be upheld here, though it appears the ALP is prepared to argue it should not be. Anybody got any ideas why it would not be upheld?
(If the precedent is upheld, the second Family First candidate will be elected. Funnily enough, I believe Day - when he was merely resigning - was manoeuvring within the party to get a different individual appointed to his casual vacancy.)