corianderstem
Blue Crack Distributor
How do you expect anyone to love you when you don't even like yourself?
There is no need for me to take practical steps in finding a girlfriend. I am an ugly loser. This is not an attitude. This is not an opinion. This is a FACT. I am kryptonite when it comes to women. I am ugly. I am a loser. There is not one thing attractive about me. And please do not say "it's your attitude that is unattractive." I can be the nicest, sweetest, most kind person with a great personality and sense of humor, and women still won't find me remotely attractive, because I have a big nose, a skinny face, and balding. I am utterly gross. Plus, I don't make much money, which explains the loser part of me.
There is no need for me to take practical steps in finding a girlfriend. I am an ugly loser. This is not an attitude. This is not an opinion. This is a FACT. I am kryptonite when it comes to women. I am ugly. I am a loser. There is not one thing attractive about me. And please do not say "it's your attitude that is unattractive." I can be the nicest, sweetest, most kind person with a great personality and sense of humor, and women still won't find me remotely attractive, because I have a big nose, a skinny face, and balding. I am utterly gross. Plus, I don't make much money, which explains the loser part of me.
success in gaining attention has been achieved.
Congrats!
I don't want to be mean, but this isn't the first time that Joe has written something like that, and then it's followed by 10-15 encouraging posts. Rinse and repeat.
Confidence comes from within, not gained or measured by what anonymous posters on a message board say.
And let me just say that confidence is really what is attractive to women. At the end of the day, they want someone who is confident in themselves, even more so than looks. In my case, I'm a chubby guy, who has gained even more weight the last few months (my fault), with a receding hairline, and I don't make a lot of money. Yet I have no problems meeting women, because I use three things - my Italian charm, quirky sense of humour, and confidence in myself - to my advantage. I have never, nor will I ever, put myself down in public or in private. That's a non-starter with women and will get me nowhere.
But, hey, no matter what we say here, Joe is still going to be writing the same things over and over. Only he will be able to someday realize that an attitude adjustment towards himself will go a long way.
Wouldn't an appropriate solution would be to encourage wives to sleep with their husbands (even if they're not always up to it) rather than immediately encouraging them to go elsewhere?
Because that makes it sounds like the woman's at fault if the man strays - well, ladies, you didn't do your job to keep your man satisfied!
Which is a sentiment that is sadly still prevelent.
The article already suggests the woman is at fault if the man strays.
Because that makes it sounds like the woman's at fault if the man strays - well, ladies, you didn't do your job to keep your man satisfied!
Which is a sentiment that is sadly still prevelent.
i think partners who are neglected tend to stray and find their needs fulfilled elsewhere if they and their partners are incapable of addressing those needs.
could be physical, emotional, etc.
so it's not so simple as saying if you're not having sex 2-3 times a week, ladies, then your man is going to stray. (though, incidentally, there *are* some religious-based "therapies" that essentially say that, since a man biologically needs a sexual release every 2-3 days [which may be true], then it is your wifely responsibility to keep up with that ... but don't get me started on the religious-therapy-morality complex where all sorts of sexual needs and behaviors are pathologized using just the slightest patina of "science" in order to gloss over what is a specific world view ... it's no different than intelligent design, but i digress ...)
but it is saying that if a partner is feeling a gaping need somewhere in the relationship, it should be addressed as a couple. and perhaps it's impossible for said couple to actually address the issue. then we make choices. and we live with those decisions.
I generally, on balance, approve of pornography.
I cant believe it's even an issue to anyone
poor girls. culture is so mean to them. no matter what they do, they are always and forever victims.
poor girls. culture is so mean to them. no matter what they do, they are always and forever victims.
Hollywood is a dream factory. they know what the girls want. if they wouldn't buy tickets to shitty romantic comedies maybe they wouldn't be made.
:for some reason, i never piloted the Milennium Falcon through hyperspace, nor did i rescue the Ark of the Covenant and keep it safe from Hitler's armies, and yet, i don't feel as if i've been lied to and cheated out of the exciting life that should have been real because i saw it in a movie.
Perhaps you missed my point.
If pornography can potentially be perceived to create unrealistic expectations, the gender flipside of that is over-the-top romance.