CosmoKramer
Rock n' Roll Doggie
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2004
- Messages
- 3,325
No, this isn't another "Rank them" thread.
I just wanted to share my thoughts on fans, including myself, and how we rate things.
I never know when a U2 album comes out if I'm too easy or hard when judging the music. I see people rank U2 albums and they are all between 7/10 and 8/10 or more than half are 10/10. Perhaps that is how they really feel but for me, even the mighty Joshua Tree is not 10/10.
The reason being, that would mean (to me) that every song is a 10 and that isn't the case. Overall, its a classic album but I think I have it at about an 8/10. Truth be told, I don't know if an album exists that every song (10 minimum) is a 10/10(even Thriller or the White Album, etc...)
For me, AB and JT are both about 8/10(just under actually when you average the songs) by contrast, one of the lower rated albums for me is Zooropa at a 4.9/10(Passengers and October would be at the bottom for me with Passengers at probably a 2/10 but I never scored it as I don't consider it a U2 album). Its funny because I'll see someone say the new album is an 8/10 and I'm thinking they really like it but then the other album scores are all 9/10 or 10/10 and its like....guess they don't like (as much perhaps).
I mean, I get if you love Zooropa but would you give every song on it a 10/10 if you do? Those that have read my posts over the years know I really like HTDAAB. But even with that said, the album is a 6.7/10 for me (AMAW is a 4/10 and Crumbs is a 3/10).
My question is, how do you personally score an album? I take the average of the songs but would be fine with adding in other things like "cohesiveness" or "mood/tone" scores.
And yes, it's all a matter of preference but I'm just curious.
By the way, my scoring:
10-Classic......With or Without you
9-Excellent
8-Very Good
7-Good
6-Solid (pretty good)
5- Average (at best)
4- Pretty Bad
3- Bad
2- Very Bad
1- Horrible (Epic shit).......Miami
Sent from my iPad using U2 Interference
I just wanted to share my thoughts on fans, including myself, and how we rate things.
I never know when a U2 album comes out if I'm too easy or hard when judging the music. I see people rank U2 albums and they are all between 7/10 and 8/10 or more than half are 10/10. Perhaps that is how they really feel but for me, even the mighty Joshua Tree is not 10/10.
The reason being, that would mean (to me) that every song is a 10 and that isn't the case. Overall, its a classic album but I think I have it at about an 8/10. Truth be told, I don't know if an album exists that every song (10 minimum) is a 10/10(even Thriller or the White Album, etc...)
For me, AB and JT are both about 8/10(just under actually when you average the songs) by contrast, one of the lower rated albums for me is Zooropa at a 4.9/10(Passengers and October would be at the bottom for me with Passengers at probably a 2/10 but I never scored it as I don't consider it a U2 album). Its funny because I'll see someone say the new album is an 8/10 and I'm thinking they really like it but then the other album scores are all 9/10 or 10/10 and its like....guess they don't like (as much perhaps).
I mean, I get if you love Zooropa but would you give every song on it a 10/10 if you do? Those that have read my posts over the years know I really like HTDAAB. But even with that said, the album is a 6.7/10 for me (AMAW is a 4/10 and Crumbs is a 3/10).
My question is, how do you personally score an album? I take the average of the songs but would be fine with adding in other things like "cohesiveness" or "mood/tone" scores.
And yes, it's all a matter of preference but I'm just curious.
By the way, my scoring:
10-Classic......With or Without you
9-Excellent
8-Very Good
7-Good
6-Solid (pretty good)
5- Average (at best)
4- Pretty Bad
3- Bad
2- Very Bad
1- Horrible (Epic shit).......Miami
Sent from my iPad using U2 Interference