SkeeK
The Original, Rock n' Roll Doggie, VIP PASS
This came up in the new album forum, and I first posted this there, but decided to move it to a new thread
There was a bit of an argument about whether the first half of U2 album is always stronger than the second half. I think usually this is the case.. though I do find the second half is usually more interesting.
But I decided to go through the songs and objectively assign them 5 star ratings. By objectively, I mean that personally So Cruel is one of my all time favourite U2 songs, but I only give it 2.5 stars because I know it's not generally well-liked. I've been reading this forum for four years, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what 'u2 fans in general' think about things. Obviously some of you will vehemently deny these ratings, but overall I think they're pretty accurate as a reflection of general opinion.
1:
Zoo Station - good.. 3
EBTTRT - good to great.. 3.5
One - Classic.. 5
UTTEOTW - great, almost classic.. 4.5
WGRYWH - good.. 3
So Cruel - decent to good.. 2.5
2:
The Fly - great.. 4
Mysterious ways - great.. 4
TTTYAATW - decent.. 2
Ultraviolet.. 3.75
Acrobat.. 3.75
Love is Blindness.. 3.5 (would give 4+ for live version)
Songs like Acrobat and UV are tricky because they have strong vocal support, but many people find them average and stay out of the fawning threads.
Anyway, i'm going to do the math and see how it turns out.
side one average: 3.58 (i'm very tempted to give another half star to so cruel (my fav) to make it 3.6666. or if you put Zoostation at 3.5, EBTTRT at 4, as well as so cruel at 3, it's 3.83
side two average: 3.5. I could probably drop UV and Acro down to 3.5, which would make the total 3.4.
This is all very arbitrary and I did it with no prethinking, but merely to see what side I thought everyone thinks is better.
There's a lot of half points here and there one could change, but I think overall the two sides are about even.
And before you go trashing the low ratings i gave amazing songs, this is all in reference to other U2 songs.
There was a bit of an argument about whether the first half of U2 album is always stronger than the second half. I think usually this is the case.. though I do find the second half is usually more interesting.
But I decided to go through the songs and objectively assign them 5 star ratings. By objectively, I mean that personally So Cruel is one of my all time favourite U2 songs, but I only give it 2.5 stars because I know it's not generally well-liked. I've been reading this forum for four years, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what 'u2 fans in general' think about things. Obviously some of you will vehemently deny these ratings, but overall I think they're pretty accurate as a reflection of general opinion.
1:
Zoo Station - good.. 3
EBTTRT - good to great.. 3.5
One - Classic.. 5
UTTEOTW - great, almost classic.. 4.5
WGRYWH - good.. 3
So Cruel - decent to good.. 2.5
2:
The Fly - great.. 4
Mysterious ways - great.. 4
TTTYAATW - decent.. 2
Ultraviolet.. 3.75
Acrobat.. 3.75
Love is Blindness.. 3.5 (would give 4+ for live version)
Songs like Acrobat and UV are tricky because they have strong vocal support, but many people find them average and stay out of the fawning threads.
Anyway, i'm going to do the math and see how it turns out.
side one average: 3.58 (i'm very tempted to give another half star to so cruel (my fav) to make it 3.6666. or if you put Zoostation at 3.5, EBTTRT at 4, as well as so cruel at 3, it's 3.83
side two average: 3.5. I could probably drop UV and Acro down to 3.5, which would make the total 3.4.
This is all very arbitrary and I did it with no prethinking, but merely to see what side I thought everyone thinks is better.
There's a lot of half points here and there one could change, but I think overall the two sides are about even.
And before you go trashing the low ratings i gave amazing songs, this is all in reference to other U2 songs.
Last edited: