Earnie Shavers said:Saints maybe sabotaged WITS chances. Released so close, I don't think radio stations were going to give 2 new U2 songs heavy rotation. Saints being a short, catchy rock single with GreenDay easily won the day over the rambling, non-standout WITS. I think if I surveyed people here at work - where we have the radio on all day - or friends, they wouldn't know it at all.
BonoVoxSupastar said:It got a bit of play on satellite radio, for that's the only type of radio I'll occasionally listen to...
Other than that, I have no clue as to what is getting play these days.
Axver said:
Frankly, I don't think Saints sabotaged WITS's chances nearly as much as WITS's own dull, clichetastic boringness (and its dreadful video) sabotaged its chances. No-one knows the song, and it seems that even in diehard U2 fan circles, most people don't really care much about it. How frequently is it ever mentioned on Interference?
No spoken words said:
That's awesome, that it got played on Satellite Radio because that's the only type of radio you listen to. Powerful stuff.
No spoken words said:BVS, your wording makes it seem like only satellite played the tune because you only listen to satellite. Made me chuckle. I know what you meant, though.
Axver said:
And I put Bono's comments about WITS down to the patented Bono Hyperbole Machine reaching the next stage of development. Every new U2 activity seems to receive an even more ridiculous comment from Bono. He's impossible to take seriously.
LyricalDrug said:
Heheh. I know what you mean, but he actually said Window in the Skies "might be our best song." Now, he ALWAYS says that jive about albums, but the only time I've ever heard him say it about another song was for "Stay."
u2thewho said:Running to Stand Still is really interesting in its structure, specifically the triplet-triplet-duplet beat with the piano that gives it a 3+3+2/8 feel.
discothequeLP said:6/8 time is like a really long 4/4 count -- you can still count 1 2 3 4.
the Streets intro is in 6/4
mwheelonh said:
Not really. The whole point of 6/8 time is to be counting ONE-two-three-Four-five-six. If you're just counting 1 2 3 4, then it's 4/4 time (or 4/8). The chosen time signature directly affects the feel of the song (like a waltz being in 3/4); it's not just chosen randomly. Given this logic, you could say that any time signature is just 4/4, but spread over x measures, which doesn't make any sense.
/B]
Utoo said:I'm more curious to see what people think about it now that it's 6 months old. I loved it initially and still like it now, but I'm not in love with it. The verses are forgettable & I don't get into it now until it hits the chorus and the funky stuff.
Nate Dogg said:U2 don't need hits. At least anymore....
LemonMelon said:
But they really seem to want them...