I Agree with you.. It's fun too make jokes about our critisism, but it also makes no sense!Squire said:
Your irony doesn't help your argument to be honest. what argument, by the way?
I Agree with you.. It's fun too make jokes about our critisism, but it also makes no sense!Squire said:
Your irony doesn't help your argument to be honest. what argument, by the way?
I don't agree with you're comment regarding only people who wen't to the show last night being able to really judge the new show! We all have eyes here, and the pictures don't lie!doctorwho said:
Welcome to the forum.
And hey - thanks for making your first post a complaint.
Now that my bitching is done...
I'm not sure why everyone is so stunned here. For months now there's been discussion that instead of a heart ramp stage, it'll be more of an oval. And indeed, that's what it is - yet everyone now seems surprised! Weren't you all prepared for that ONE similarity? It could be a triangle, a circle, a diamond, or whatever, this aspect would naturally bring about similarities to the heart from the last tour. This shouldn't have surprised anyone.
Now that this has been said - have you actually SEEN the show? Have you seen the lights? Have you seen the clothes? Have you heard the setlist? The only people who can talk about this are those who were at last night's show (and if you went to the rehearsal, good for you, but a rehearsal is just that - it's not the actual show). Until you see the show, you don't really know all the similarities.
Lastly, almost all the tours in the 80's were exactly the same. The backdrop might be different. Instead of having a face of the boy on the "War" album, it might be an image of a Joshua tree. But other than that, the stage design was the same. What changed was the appearance of the band (and even then, there were similarities - Bono probably changed the most) and, more importantly, the song list.
In the 90's, PopMart was even reminiscent of ZOO TV. For example, both tours had tons of props - instead of cars, there was a lemon. Instead of many TV's, there was one GIANT TV.
To me, the biggest differences in the tours were from the 80's tours to ZOO TV and from PopMart to Elevation. So in all their years of touring, U2 really has had dramatic stage changes only twice. Hence, your complaint seems rather unfounded.
PhoenixGNX said:Ok, I may get stoned for saying this, but here goes:
I'm trying not to generalize, but 90% of Europeans are Zoo TV fanatics. It's a fact I've pretty much discovered over the last 10+ years. They loved the glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour that made those shows. America, on the other hand, has been and always will be in love with The Joshua Tree/War era. I've been trading bootlegs with people all over the world for 10 years and European traders always want all the Zoo TV material where as Americans always want the earnest JT, War, or Elevation.
This may sound like a weak theory to use, but its a fact that the Europeans are in love with big shows full of gagets and innovation. American audiences are about the feeling and passion of a show. Now, remember, this doesn't apply to everyone of course. I know Americans who think Zoo TV is the best thing since sliced bread. All I'm saying is, it's been really obvious to me over the years which continent favors a particular style of U2.
I looove Zoo TV era....but when it comes down to it, one should could care less what the hell the set looks like. All that matters is that Bono's voice is strong, the band are in unison, and the show gives you a cathardic experience you will never forget. You shouldn't let the lights and bulbs blind you from what's really happening on that stage...magic.
All I can do is smile when I read a post like this! See I'm from Holland and U2 has had it's great breakthrough outside the UK in this little country... U2 themselves seem to love Holland right back, why else do 3 stadium shows in a country only having 15.000.000 inhabitants... I am a very big fan of the very early stuff from Boy/October and have seen U2 8 times now throughout 5 tours...PhoenixGNX said:Ok, I may get stoned for saying this, but here goes:
I'm trying not to generalize, but 90% of Europeans are Zoo TV fanatics. It's a fact I've pretty much discovered over the last 10+ years. They loved the glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour that made those shows. America, on the other hand, has been and always will be in love with The Joshua Tree/War era. I've been trading bootlegs with people all over the world for 10 years and European traders always want all the Zoo TV material where as Americans always want the earnest JT, War, or Elevation.
This may sound like a weak theory to use, but its a fact that the Europeans are in love with big shows full of gagets and innovation. American audiences are about the feeling and passion of a show. Now, remember, this doesn't apply to everyone of course. I know Americans who think Zoo TV is the best thing since sliced bread. All I'm saying is, it's been really obvious to me over the years which continent favors a particular style of U2.
I looove Zoo TV era....but when it comes down to it, one should could care less what the hell the set looks like. All that matters is that Bono's voice is strong, the band are in unison, and the show gives you a cathardic experience you will never forget. You shouldn't let the lights and bulbs blind you from what's really happening on that stage...magic.
Neilz said:
All I can do is smile when I read a post like this! See I'm from Holland and U2 has had it's great breakthrough outside the UK in this little country... U2 themselves seem to love Holland right back, why else do 3 stadium shows in a country only having 15.000.000 inhabitants... I am a very big fan of the very early stuff from Boy/October and have seen U2 8 times now throughout 5 tours...
Now for me beging a fan of the the glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour as you call it... All of that comes second place my friend... What I am trying to tell you guys all throughout this thread is that music comes first!... But I'm sorry to break it to you, but U2 is not the same band as they were in the Joshua Tree pediod anymore! You see, I have seen the classic Joshua Tree gig in Rotterdam and it kicks ass! U2 set the standards and ticketprices this high themselves. And we don't demand a big production, just innovation! So think I can speak for us Europeans here that you are full of shit!
You're saying that Americans love the feeling and passion of a show? Let me tell you this; A good show is about the interaction with the audience! So the feeling and passion of a show comes from both sides! U2 reacts to the crow and visa versa! In Europe all shows are GA... Zooropa, Popmart... Stadium's with 80.000 capacity crowds are all GA on the field! This truely pushes the passion and feeling of a show you see! Last tour when they played Sunday Bloody Sunday in Cologne, the whole heart went absolutely apeshit! And don't tell me that it's the same in the US cause it's not! If you've seen the Boston show and the Slane show you know what I mean!
The other thing is that Zooropa was só much different than the Outside Broadcast tour! I have some DVD's of both shows, but guess which I play most... Zooropa was truely something special, and this didn't have much to do with the big screens or the glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour
It really is a shame that you think this way of the European fans, as you are simply wrong
If you'de really want a thought out conversation, you could have made your point in a little more subtle way for starters! You said you weren't trying to generalize, but infact you were! You had this coming really, saying European U2 fans are glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour loving Zoo-TV fans!PhoenixGNX said:
Ok, your turning this into a pissing contest rather than a critically thought out conversation. You've seen 8 shows 5 tours...great..I've seen 21 shows on 6 tours and 3 continents..big deal. I know U2 and Holland have a special relationship going back to 1980. There's no need to take such defense.
I know U2 is not the same band they were in 1987 and so on. You failed to read that I wasnt "GENERALIZING" Europeans. I simply stated that most of the Europeans I've come across (and there's been tons) in my life prefer the Zoo TV type era over JT type era. Its NOT what I THINK, its what I've encountered over the years. Therefore, IM NOT FULL OF SHIT. And it doesnt mean Europeans dont have PASSION...if thats what you thought than you missed my whole point of contrast.
As for "feeling and passion". You plucking out one show that you've seen on DVD hardly dictates what you think American audiences are like. Do I think European audiences are more boisterious? DUH, of course! But, just like you were at Rotterdam '87, I was at San Jose 2001 in which Bono was quoted as having the best show in his entire career. The audience was deafening. But, once again, pissing contest. Who cares. Sunday Bloody Sunday more intense in Ireland than than the U.S.??? Noooo, really...I wonder why.
Fact is, I cant believe your going to let "stage innovation" disappoint you. If stage and tech is your thing, than hey, sorry if the stage sucks. I simply could care less what surrounds the band. And I'm sorry U2 and Willie Williams let you down.
Neilz said:
If you'de really want a thought out conversation, you could have made your point in a little more subtle way for starters! You said you weren't trying to generalize, but infact you were! You had this coming really, saying European U2 fans are glitz, high tech, bulb flashing glamour loving Zoo-TV fans!
Anyways, you coming across tons of Europeans en thereby concluding that we love bulb flashing glamour and you the feeling and passion is just bull&*... I live in Europe and know for Dutch fans anyway, that the glitter and glamour (as you call it) is not important at all! Of course Zooropa was amazing, but that was because Zooropa was very special by itself! This had nothing to do with the big screens!
I may however have an explanation for you're thoughts that European's love the big shows more... And that's because U2 play more shows for less people in Europe... Holland alone gets 3 shows per tour where we only have 15.000.000 inhabitant... This means that in Europe a larger number of 'non-U2-fans' get to see U2 than in America... And this again means that these people may indeed come for the spectacle... But this says nothing bout the true European U2 fans!
I would like to make clear to you that the reason that U2 does arena's in the US and stadium's in Europe has nothing to do with what we are arguing about! The reason is that U2 doesn't like to play stadium's in the states because GA is not allowed in these big venues! In Europe, Australia and all over the world really, this is the common thing and stadium shows are a very different thing here then in the states... So thát is the reason, and not because America wan't feeling and Europe wan't glitter!
Oh, and you mentioned that Bono said he played his best gig at the one you attended? Bono says a lot of things during gigs... In Cologne that year during the Elevation tour he said that the Europeans were so much louder than the American audience... I won't say Bono is right about this, because Bono says a lot of things to kiss ass during gigs... My conclusion comes from viewing multiple U2 DVD's from all over the world, and my conclusion is that the American's are rather passive during the shows... Take it or leave it...
Last up; I'm only disappointed in the production! And it seems to be that am not the only one! A guy from LA who actually has been to the San Diego show has the same complaint's as I have! The producion is not as innovative as we are used to from U2 (and Willie)... But again; this doesn't mean that I will be disappointed in the shows, the band, the music and the experience! Don't get these thing mixed up! The stageset doesn't deterime wether a show is any good! Only U2 said themselves that they don't want to repeat themselves... But from what I've seen sofar, that is exactly what they seem to be doing...
Ok, then it's the end of the discussion... Although a shame that you didn't react to my point in difference in stadium shows in Europe and the States...PhoenixGNX said:
This could go back and fourth forever. Again, I never said Europe didnt have passion. But, your not listening. IMO, any fan of U2 has passion. As for the stage, if there was no oval it wouldnt be a reminder of Elevation. And I never said you were the only one who had complaints. Obviously I know the stage doesnt dictate a good show. Thats the basis for my arguement. U2 repeated themselves...25 years and they finally hit a wall. Sue them. And for the last time, I wasnt attacking YOU! I was referring to the people ive met in Europe while attending U2 shows and what their opinion was! So, I'm letting it go. As for the San Jose gig I was at : blablabla
djerdap said:It is a tragedy that we have U2 fans who complain that the band is wearing the same CLOTHES as the previous tours.
A tragedy, I tell you.
Especially since we have a setlist with The Electric Co., An Cat Dubh, Zoo Station, The Fly, Running To Stand Still and 40 in it.
Don't over react please! It's just a discussion! Come on!djerdap said:It is a tragedy that we have U2 fans who complain that the band is wearing the same CLOTHES as the previous tours.
A tragedy, I tell you.
Especially since we have a setlist with The Electric Co., An Cat Dubh, Zoo Station, The Fly, Running To Stand Still and 40 in it.
rica said:" Don't you wish your could go back to 1982 man? " It's 2005 and U2 is on tour to support Vertigo. Enjoy the present or sit at home and listen to the prior tours you liked so much
Vote For Pedro!
rica said:Quote from Napoleon Dynamite - Squire reminds me of the Uncle who wanted to back in time to 1982
rica said:Quote from Napoleon Dynamite - Squire reminds me of the Uncle who wanted to back in time to 1982