theu2fly said:In many ways...
The helped Bono sing his falsetto in With Or Without You when he struggled. They sing "Early morning, april 4th, a shot rings out in the memphis sky"
Not to mention great reception on every single song...
Utoo said:This is going to turn into a "my country's balls are bigger than yours" debate.
theu2fly said:In many ways...
The helped Bono sing his falsetto in With Or Without You when he struggled. They sing "Early morning, april 4th, a shot rings out in the memphis sky"
Not to mention great reception on every single song...
God Part III said:I was at the Milan concert. Just a quick note, did you watch the Elevation part?
Virtually every man or woman in the audience moved their hands. During New Year's Day, the entire stadium sang along to the piano parts of New Year's Day. The repeat of With Or Without You chorus "oooh"-part lasted forever, and yes, we did help singing it, but he wasn't struggling with his voice, so you can't even make that comparison. And also, due to the mixing, the audience sounds less loud. Everyone went nuts during Vertigo 2. And you haven't seen them during Streets. That was incredible. Everyone, including those in the back, was totally dedicated to showing their U2-love. Watch the video again, you won't see that energy far back in the Mexico stadium.
It was an amazing night, and the crowd was awfully much into it. I have never seen such a crowd before, the Dublin crowd was stale in comparison. When a full concert surfaces someday, you will see that I'm right ;D
But the Mexico is still the superior concert, yeah.
toscano said:These arguments are just stupid, unless you were actually AT both concerts you don't know which was better. So many factors like the mixing come into play.
Now, the US-shot shows like Boston and Chicago you can tell the audiences are pretty much typical US lame in comparison to Slane/Mexico/Milan.
If Sarajevo WAS the greatest it would be because there were so many Italians there......
Blue Room said:
you say you cant tell based on a video/dvd. (Which I would agree with) Then you say Chicago and Boston and you can tell on the DVD?? Its one way or the other.
LemonMacPhisto said:Because if the guy in the 56th row doesn't sing along with the song, the entire show is doomed and Bono is a sad panda.
elevated_u2_fan said:
That makes me a saaaddd Panda...
elevated_u2_fan said:
Good point
toscano said:
No it's not. Theres a difference between tring to differentiate between one crowd being SLIGHTLY rowdier and into it than another, and then there is the grand canyon like differences between US and European/Latin American crowds....
By the way, for the last 20+ years I've gone to mostly US shows, but went to many many European shows prior to moving here. There is a massive difference in crowd reactions at concerts.
Blue Room said:
The whole thing is a ridiculous argument anyway. Something that is completely subjective. The Milan crowd do not seem any better of a crowd to me over the Chicago DVD based on the way they were shot. I'm not saying they werent, I'm saying there is no way to tell based on the DVD's.
Utoo said:or some drunk chick talking to her boyfriend.