Just to bring this back to the “is mercy god-like or shithouse” conversation again - I think the one thing that is unarguable is that there is an authenticity to the emotional tone of the song that is largely absent in the last 20 years. And for some people their tolerance to lyrics, preference for sounds etc etc will sway them one way or tother, but there has to be something close to universal acknowledgement that the emotional release that builds and explodes throughout that song has a sense of genuineness and realness. In terms of songs since with the same qualities, Little Things is the only one that immediately springs to mind, and it’s no coincidence that it was born from the buds of Mercy.
Earnest Bono is oftentimes, and quite confusingly, both the most endearing and the most cringeworthy Bono. The earnestness of this song is a large part of why it’s so polarising. I think the thing that tips it towards the good for me is that his earnestness isn’t just about WHAT he says, its felt so much in HOW he says it.
Completely agree with this, and I feel like I finally know what people mean when they describe Mercy as 'unabashedly-u2', it feels so free from inhibitions and overthinking, and not afraid to wear it's heart on its sleeve, for better or for worse.
With the announcement of the HTDAAB re-release, I ended up going back to listen to 00's era U2 - songs like 'Mercy', 'SYCMIOYO', but also 'Kite', and 'Walk On'. Back at the time, I viewed these songs as sappy and cheesy, and tended to overlook them in favour of the band's edgier 90s work, but right now I feel like I'm really connecting with how emotionally open, honest and vulnerable a lot of the 00's material was.
And I've thought the same thing as you - in spite of such powerful and personal subject matter on SoI and SoE, there's nothing on those albums for me which comes close to the music on ATYCLB or HTDAAB, or even 'Windows in the Skies', in terms of raw emotional power, resonance, and earnestness. I can't put my finger on what it is, but even the tracks that are going for the same thing, like 'Song for Someone' or 'Landlady' don't resonate with me the way 'Kite' or 'Sometimes' do. The only exception I can think of is the latter half of 'Little Things', and as you say, I don't think it's a coincidence that that it evolved from 'Mercy', i.e. music from the 00's era.
I'd love to see more of this side of U2, but just as I wanted the darker, ironic U2 of the 90s to return back in 2004, it may just be that the band isn't in that heartfelt headspace of the 00's anymore, here in 2024. Their focus nowadays seems to be on the 'craft' of songwriting, and - others have put this better than I can - making music in a more 'cerebral', rather than heartfelt fashion.
Whatever they do next, I just hope there's a little less strategy and calculation behind it. There's something about Ryan Tedder's influence on their music, regardless of quality or my personal opinion on the music itself, that feels almost like the band 'outsourced' the choruses and hooks to a modern, successful, younger songwriter, to try and achieve radio success. The band themselves, and the messy, but magical alchemy that made them who they were, seemed to be absent in favour of whatever hooks and choruses Ryan Tedder wrote with/for them (and it does feel like he did a lot - 'Summer of Love' and One republic's 'West Coast' have near-identical choruses, and even the lead guitar riff was taken from that band). At its worst, their 2010's output doesn't sound like U2's music, it sounds like U2 collaborating with another, younger band who they're trying to emulate, and in doing so, failing to express who they themselves are. And to add insult to injury, they didn't even get a big hit out of any of it.