Search results

:lol: It's not that way

And? Nothing?

Read both

Eagles - One Of These Nights

It's such a cruel world...........................:wink: Look for shelter in old music.............it's the only way. Try to discover bands you've never listened to................U2 need a bit time yet ;)

I used to be a great Oasis fan, it would be only a pleasure for me if this new album rocks. That's what I hope to see in a very poor music panorama we're having nowdays.

The logic? It seems like you haven't caught what this word means seeing what you're saying there..............................You're making a little illogical jam..................Sorry, don't get me wrong, but I would say this comment is the most inappropriate one ever seen in the whole forum's...

Don't need any dictionary. I don't speak of grammar or what a dictionary tells.

Radio hums.................................................:ohmy:

:wink: Well, ok, but it's also important to respect other tastes when your opinion has been said. Sometimes we get squeezed by our own opinion :wink: I used to be a big Oasis fan, I used to buy even all their singles........mine it's just a love who broke because I was deceived by Oasis's...

I see your point, and I'd have your same opinion. The fact is that the outside pressure makes you crazy, how many antiU2 criticians are waiting out there like vultures with bleeding teeth? It's up to U2 to not get in their claws, by getting out a great record and make another successfull tour...

:lol:

Well, if you talk about a big hamburger, then maybe it's not necessarly good. This can be objective or subjective If you talk about a big artist, it's good. This is objective and subjective

Well, it might be that I'm wrong, I don't have the truth in my pocket. The fact is that Oasis had everything in their hands to be a great band. But they kinda didn't make that. But my point mainly is this: U2 gave us music we never heard, Pearl Jam, Bruce Springsteen, gave us music we never...

Big can be a synonymous of good

Are you sure about that? Then, why were there many bashing down How to Dismantle An Atomic Bomb, and they keep saying U2 is no longer the biggest, greatest, largest and whatsoever band of the world? Opinions change very fast, even when you've done lots of magnificent things. You get from stars...

Well, it ignores now, and it will always ignore Britneys and co. The 2nd point, well.................I have never seen someone born big...........everyone who is big (truly big) came from his hometown........................this is another question actually......you can be big even when no one...

What's to expound? A bricklayer who builds a house, makes art ,and he's big, an architect who buys a project, doesn't make art, and he's not big........

So Bono stated more or less "2 crap records and you're out", "You want a new U2 record because you want the best, or what's the point?". What means that? Maybe that a musician has always something to prove? Even after 30 years? You can call this humility, what Mr.Gallagher misses

It's understood. Only the biggest make art

No. I don't measure Art by sold records..............................

So what? Does this make them big? It was the phenomenon of the moment. If it's for sold records, then even someone like Madonna, who can neither put 2 notes together, can be taken as an "artist". They had a fair start, but tell me Oasis songs you can put on the same history level of a U2's...

if the album comes out in january, the single will be there around the first days of december. In the next weeks I hope we gonna have some fresh news about

Toto - White Sister

Oasis was never a big band, absolutely never. As Morning Glory came out they could get considered one of the most interesting band that was rising, a young band with a cool future. But as the years went by they remained stuck in nothing else than a brit pop band role, always claiming themselves...