There is a massive difference if you are talking about female genital mutilation, which causes fistulas, an inability to urinate, death, etc.
What male circumcision could probably properly be compared to is the removal of the clitoral hood (and even then it is very questionable because male circumcision would still result in the vast majority of men being able to experience orgasm while the removal of the clitoral hood would result in the opposite - ie. the vast majority of women would no longer be able to climax). ETA: There is also some medical science supporting the thesis that male circumcision leads to lower HIV infection rates in countries where hygiene is an issue - italics mine because this last part is often left out. There is no medical reason whatsoever to remove the clitoral hood. |
Kind of silly that God wants you to cut a part of your dick off.
No thanks. |
Quote:
There's also evidence that the loss in sensitivity of the glans is responsible for at least some instances of erectile dysfunction |
Cutting off a part of your body just to slightly lower the risk of you getting an STD when we live in a world full of condoms is kind of ridiculous.
|
Quote:
it is a commandment from God. Wandering around in the desert all those years, one would encounter a lot of sand storms. And with loose robes, well, sand is little bitty pieces of glass, that could get quite uncomfortable. |
Quote:
It gets a bit more grey in African countries where HIV infections did drop (statistically significantly) among circumcised men. Again, this is a function of access to hygiene, but in places where condoms may be unavailable due to remoteness of location, too expensive for someone living on a buck a day, or culturally not accepted and where the HIV is at epidemic levels, there may be some argument for medical merit. As the WHO has advocated, for example. |
You make a valid point, anitram. :up:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
i used to go to the CT Forum in high school. good to see it was continuing. it was fantastic for a teenager to see heavyweights in action like that.
there is no reason for circumcision. none. if i had a child i would not circumcise him. period. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe we should ban abortion? You don't want anyone telling you what to do with your body. Don't tell anyone what to do with mine. |
Quote:
Millions of baby boys have thought the same thing as their penises were being mutilated. |
I find it amusing that Germany of all places made such a distinctly anti-Semitic ruling. They need to get over that shit.
|
The kid was Muslim. :p
Anyway, politicians were quick to intervene and now passed a law legalizing circumcision. It was such a great chance to put an end to the entire conflict in the Middle East, just having Muslims and Jews unite to rail against the insensitive Germans outlawing circumcision of boys, thereby realizing "Goddammit, we are one and the same!" :wink: |
Arabs (though not Persians) are Semitic too, actually.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com