So a guy in his 40's is admitting to being an asshole and proud of it on an Internet forum.
Sounds about right.
Thank you very much!
And here comes someone else who likes to argue just to argue.
To you and BVS:
I didn't say it was their core demographic. I didn't even use a synonym for core. What I said was that it was going to be a larger portion of their demographic this time out than previous tours due to the ticket prices and arena settings.
The exact percentage? I have no idea. Contact live nation for that.
Does U2 still do well with you younger people? Yes.
I never argued that the core demographic of U2 fans and concert ticket holders identify WAR as the peak of their fandom.
Just the fact that you're not addressing my points for the most part and have to distort them when you do so very minimally says it all.
This will be an older U2 fans' tour. How do I know?
1) The aforementioned ticket prices and smaller capacity arenas.
2) The fact that we're now at 3 albums in a row without a hit. I love 2 of the 3 to pieces and while NLOTH is at the bottom of my album rankings, I don't take as big of issue with is as a lot of people. But reality is reality. It isn't 2000 or 2004 anymore and ALOT of the newer fans drawn in during that time period have sadly moved on. Plus, a lot just won't be paying $350 whether they've moved on or not. They'll watch it on YouTube .
3)The crowd getting older at every tour since 360- and I've seen all of them in multiple cities - speaks to the trend discussed in paragraph 2. U2 still have far more younger people than other bands their age, still even to an impressive level. However, the last time they equaled the older demographic in attendance numbers was Vertigo. I'd put money on that.
4) The trend from paragraphs 2 and 3 was much more noticeable on JT than it was on I&E. Even accounting for the fact that it was a clear nostalgia tour from the start, the young fans know JT like anyone else and you'd expect them at a stadium show.
5) You're going to get a lot of people there on either their own experience or word of mouth from JT. Casuals will take last year as evidence that they're finally going back through the back catalog and buy tickets in hopes of catching JT or War tracks. Will Acrobat harm these people? No and I never said it would. Would leaving out almost every imaginable 80s hit, Streets and Bad included while playing 10 songs from 2014 to today? Most likely. See paragraph 1.
So we're hung up one one song when the point was the entire set.
Short of taking a representative sample poll of U2 casuals, there is no objective way to tell for sure what songs from what albums are more or less obscure. Unless you're talking scarlet vs wild horses or Jerusalem vs Walk On or similar.
So really all we can hope for is an intelligent t discussion and the understanding that there are non laughable arguments to be made both ways.
Regardless of what the self proclaimed asshole says.