clearly they are going to add dates as shows sell out - another 10/11 shows in the Cities already listed. Do we think we know where - apart from obvious ones such as Dublin and London ? Mike
yeah its kind of a dick move to wait to announce all the dates so that the first ones sell out quickly first. sure it makes u2 look better, but it fucks over the fans who are trying to plan this shit out
Jesus--jumping to conclusions much?
I think U2 might be having some trouble finding stadiums to play in the U.S. The fall is the worst time for a stadium tour with the football season starting. Also, I tried to looking up the NFL schedule and the dates/locations for games aren't released yet. Not that the NFL and the owners don't know this information already, but maybe we will get more dates and cities later.
In that original list of October dates, there was a gap between Houston on October 14th and Norman on the 19th. Perhaps a Bay Area date could appear there, if the October dates remain the same.
yeah its kind of a dick move to wait to announce all the dates so that the first ones sell out quickly first. sure it makes u2 look better, but it fucks over the fans who are trying to plan this shit out
Yeah, I agree totally. Would it really be so hard to even say which dates have been provisionally booked depending on demand? This is U2 - the biggest band in the world, apparently! If they can't sell out stadiums then who can? The thing I've learned from spending time on this forum is that U2 fans will do anything to see them live - cross oceans, get into crazy debt, put marriages in jeopardy etc. No matter how bad things are economically, a U2 concert tour is still a big event for which the demand will be huge. So they (or their management) should have the balls and the ambition to state upfront where they INTEND to play, and stop messing about with all this additional shows 'by popular demand' nonsense!
Reason # 500 to go back to Arenas. SIGH.