U2Girl1978
Blue Crack Addict
The pictures fall under public domain. They were gathering in a public place. How do you think news cameras get the right?
No you have no right posting people's pics on here without their permission.
The pictures fall under public domain. They were gathering in a public place. How do you think news cameras get the right?
Thank you @ryancoke71
@U2Girl1978 EXACTLY!
All I am going to say is that I am highly frustrated and disappointed in this posting. There was a lot of bullshit and lack of knowledge about what really went down in Pittsburgh. I am also pretty personally offended and find it really disingenuous to be put in photos and be made complicit in a list that I didn't agree with, fought against, and had ZERO TO LITTLE hand in running, outside of helping with the merge and working with Dave since Lou couldn't be chuffed to do so. I only lurk on here and to be put up on a board like this is simply wrong. If you have issues with people, you bring it up with them, not like this.
the issue is there are idiots who will start a line five days earlier, ie moncton.Or not b/c it is silly and a waste of their time.
the issue is there are idiots who will start a line five days earlier, ie moncton.
that's idiotic.
What is being described here stands in pretty sharp contrast to how I believe the list was managed in Toronto. I think Toronto was fair with no shenanigans or plus 1 ideas.
bulltproof, I PMed you. Not going to get into this on public boards, but I definitely did not tell you to 'shut up' in terms of shutting you down, but was probably in the midst of trying to fairly deal with two lists, and having ten people shouting at the same time.
I don't know how else to take "shut up".
shut up1. To cause (someone) to stop speaking; silence.
2. To stop speaking.
I didn't know I started the list by not leaving. I thought Lou was the catalyst; I mean, after all, she had started a list before that morning. And although you were a little rude (which I mistook as not very receptive to my thoughts and feelings), I felt that you were getting shafted. They tried to put names before you on the list and you were right there!
the issue is there are idiots who will start a line five days earlier, ie moncton.
that's idiotic.
Just to be clear gvox, do you believe that every person in Toronto showed up at the venue ahead of time to sign in? Each person on the list actually and physically came to the Rogers Center to put their name on the list that were ahead of you and I? Specifically those who were travelling from Montreal?
.
coolian2 said:maybe there shouldn't be naming and shaming, but this is downright the wrong way to have a ga queue.
gvox said:The chief reason the list started is because venues were not allowing an overnight lineup.
U2Girl1978 said:If we didn't have a list, then how would lining up work?
ultimately though, if you're willing enough to put yourself out there as king/queen of the ga queue, you're putting yourself out there publicly, and if it gets reported online, so be it.
no sympathy. if you don't like people criticising how you handled the line (and it should be whoever arrives first on show day, not this shit), then don't handle the line.
you're putting yourself out there. handle it.
cobl04 said:It's a U2 concert, not a meeting of the Stonecutters.
So follow their rules and get there as early as you want on the day of the gig?
gvox said:Well what time would you call that, then? (I'm not being snarky..)
Because even with a list, it got backed up from 7 am, to 6 am, to 4 am..I think 4 am was the earliest it got changed to, though.
So what is "the day of"? 12:01 am?
Mark, what time did you get in line in Toronto?
I was the one that put U2Brothr on the list. He asked if his friend that was on top of the bridge could be put on the list. I said only if he comes down here.
There was no problem. U2Brothr got his friend and both were on the list during my shift 3am - 6am.