Thoughts about the new stage design? + Rolling Stone re: T H E C L A W

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Neither the stage, nor the supporting structure will move. The Crab is not even that forward thinking in terms of engineering.

Knowing Mark Fisher's M.O. like I know the back of my hand this is going to be a very simple steel structure - basically two arches in two directions. Picture the Popmart arch in two directions.

The whole idea is tension and compression for anyone who has sat through a structural engineering class. The big squares at the Crab's 'feet' are actually ballast (basically giant weights) that will prevent the crab from moving. They will either be concrete slabs, or more likely giant tanks to be filled with water. Fisher has used this method on every tour he has designed. It is a cheap and easy way to keep stages in place. Giant plastic tanks are toured (and usually kept under the stage) - the steel structure is connected to them like giant heavy feet and that creates the foundation. This prevents the structure from swaying in high winds and rain. The brilliance behind it is that all they have to do when they get to a city is fill them with water. When enough are used they achieve the necesary weight to keep the steel structure in place.

The tricky part about the crab is its geometry. All the lights and sound and stuff will be pulling the body of the crab down directly over the stage in compression, thus pushing the legs out in tension. That is wny the ballast has to be heavy enough to push it back so C=T.

02.IL.24.gif


Here, however, if they are only utilizing four locations, I would guess they will tour four multi-ton concrete slabs. These are usually precast and are very commonly used to keep hoists attached to the sides of buildings when they are under construction. Since they usually tour at least one crane (ore rent locally) it is just about picking them up and dropping them on a flatbed trailer.

If the 170-ton gossip number is accurate (and it just may be with lights, sound, spiky thing, etc.) than divided by four it would only be 42.5 tons or 85,000 pounds being transferred to the crab's feet (plus the weight of the structure.) Not such a big deal.

As they seem to be utilizing arches (one of the strongest structural systems going back to the Romans) this really should not be all that difficult to tour.

Yes, they typically take three sets of structural steel with them when touring outside, but not all the electronics, lights, sound, and scenic elements (ie the really expensive stuff like LED screens.) Those items are packed up first after the gig, loaded-out and then trucked to the next location where one of the other two sets of steel has already been erected. It makes for a very efficient leap-frog logistics plan. All they have to do is set up the steel in three consecutive cities, then move the expensive assets and the band to the next city.

So thus, there will be three crabs.

As for the fabric tensile stuff on top, I have to imagine what we have seen is only very sketchy. It is obviously there to hide the guts of the production, but I do not think (hope) it is going to look like the basic renderings we have seen.

My current concern is the height of the crab. I actually hope the thing is extremely high. If the footprint shows something approximately 50 yards by 50 yards as can be seen on the US football stadium diagrams, I am hoping the lights are trimmed at a very high level, otherwise this thing is going to look very squat.

In any case, I am amped up by this idea because I truly think the endzone stadium show has run its course. Between U2, The Rolling Stones, Genesis, and I hate to say it, Bon Jovi, I really do not think there is much more you can do with a stage and a giant screen to be impressive.

Lets see what transpires, but I hope the team continues to release nuggets for geeks like me to chew on.

The tent part is duel purpose. Obviously it hides the guts but Willie Williams is a big fan of 'structural lighting' or shining lights against the stage structure (like the popmart arch). I've also heard rumours that the a full colour PIGI projection (basically a bit like Elevation) is going to be used and they could conceivably use the tenting to project against.

From Fishers previous renderings which normally only bear a superfical resemblance to the finished product, I think a lot of the detail is missing.
 
It's obviously not the same stage. JoBros are playing at GM arena, U2 is at BC Place Stadium.

The JBs do play a stadium in one or two places.

It's odd to get my head around this, but Bono has a Jb association. U2 are shareholders in Live Nation, who are doing both tours.
 
okay, the novelty's worn off and I've decided it's basically just a round stage. there's not even a decent sized screen for visuals.

How can seeing a pre-rendered image be a "novelty"?, could people not at least wait until they see the stage in real form before starting the bitching? or have we stooped to a new low that we have to whine about a computer image?
 
Well maybe lets wait until we see the actual stage with all its lights and screens in full use before judging it, there is no way that the actual image we see is anywhere near to scale, so the screen will be ALOT bigger i would imagine, also as noted there could be another screen at a lower level, but they are not going to show off everything in this image.
 
And this quote by Willie makes me belive there is alot more to this stage than meets the eye:

"Started the day by meeting with the lighting supply company for the tour, who have gradually been coming to terms with the magnitude of the project. They now also understand the fact that the staging set up is so radically different from the norm that none of us can make assumptions about how everything will come together - traditional methods simply will not apply."
 
can you please post more from Willies entries - is there a blog or something like this? I forgotten the links - years past...

I think the stage will move - it would not be impossible like said above. If the 4 feets are in a rail it would be possible. Of course the outer circle (the B-Stage) will stay where it is. Would be possible that the main stage with a length of something like 20 meters will be lift some meters in the air and then the tent-construction move some meters forward. Of course there would be the sound problem - that's what would speak against it - but besides that...
I hope for it.

Adam said something like this in an interview with a german radio station "engery".
 
can you please post more from Willies entries - is there a blog or something like this? I forgotten the links - years past...

I think the stage will move - it would not be impossible like said above. If the 4 feets are in a rail it would be possible. Of course the outer circle (the B-Stage) will stay where it is. Would be possible that the main stage with a length of something like 20 meters will be lift some meters in the air and then the tent-construction move some meters forward. Of course there would be the sound problem - that's what would speak against it - but besides that...
I hope for it.

Adam said something like this in an interview with a german radio station "engery".

there would also be the little problem of the crushing of human skulls as this giant contraption moves along the field.

other than that, yea... i don't see why it won't be moving.
 
A lot of my disappointment with the stage is due to the crab legs. I would hate to have purchased a $110 seat (after service charges), just to find out that my view of the stage and screen is obstructed by a goddamn crab leg. That's why I'm more likely to purchase a $30 seat at this point.

I think the whole 360 degree thing is a mistake. Why open up the back of the stage for 10-15% more seats if the show is otherwise going to suffer from the setup?
 
Relax people, we haven't even seen REAL pictures of the stage, just a 3d animation. I'm sure there's more to it, we'll just have to wait for the first concert and look at the thousands of pics/vids uploaded to the internet.
 
It's funny to me, how people are already jumping to conclusions. I am sure that these objections were thought about and that the band is looking out for the best possible enjoyment for the fans.
We need to wait and see.
 
It's funny to me, how people are already jumping to conclusions. I am sure that these objections were thought about and that the band is looking out for the best possible enjoyment for the fans.
We need to wait and see.

Well said!
 
:love:

This thread = 5 stars. I can't stop laughing reading about the 'crab thing' and people at work are looking at me funny.

:lmao:
 
Does anyone have legitimate info on the stage design? Because I highly doubt it will move/spin....the canvas could flip up and be a video screen or something like that.
 
A lot of my disappointment with the stage is due to the crab legs. I would hate to have purchased a $110 seat (after service charges), just to find out that my view of the stage and screen is obstructed by a goddamn crab leg. That's why I'm more likely to purchase a $30 seat at this point.

I think the whole 360 degree thing is a mistake. Why open up the back of the stage for 10-15% more seats if the show is otherwise going to suffer from the setup?

Because people are always asking U2 to try something different maybe?, and the fact that as i read somewhere else there really isnt much more you can do with an end stage setup that hasnt already been done.
 
Because I highly doubt it will move/spin.....

The screen can be lowered to the stage or to the lighting truss to be out of view.

Also, there seems to be seven spotlight locations in the uppermost side/rear balcony sections of every stadium blueprint. There's also 3 other towers like other stadium show near the soundboard area.
 
The screen can be lowered to the stage or to the lighting truss to be out of view.

Also, there seems to be seven spotlight locations in the uppermost side/rear balcony sections of every stadium blueprint. There's also 3 other towers like other stadium show near the soundboard area.

I was thinking that, i mean there must be a reason why that spike sticking right through the middle actually goes all the way down to the ground, something must happen.
 
Okay, seriously, why is this thread getting only 4 stars? This should be a 5-star thread for Bonocrab alone. :tsk:
 
Willie must be reading us:

Name is unofficially officially "The Claw"

Wednesday, 4th March 2009
New York. David Letterman Show. Started the day by meeting with the lighting supply company for the tour, who have gradually been coming to terms with the magnitude of the project. They now also understand the fact that the staging set up is so radically different from the norm that none of us can make assumptions about how everything will come together - traditional methods simply will not apply.
One thing which has made me laugh is that the stage design has already earned its nickname. Above the performing area is a huge four-legged structure that effectively straddles the football field, from which all the paraphernalia of the show is suspended (this in lieu of a roof, being outdoors and all.) I've been working on this, off and on, for about two and a half years now, having shown the band the first drawings whilst we were still on the Vertigo tour. During the evolution of the structure it has, at various times, come to resemble several different things; a dockyard crane, a cactus, a giant crab, the Theme Building at Los Angeles airport. It went very Louise Bourgeois for a while, then a little space age. In its final incarnation though, its sleek curves and four talon-like legs have been dubbed "The Claw", remembering the fairground machine from Toy Story. This really amused me, spawning a fantasy of it descending and grabbing members of the audience, all of whom, presumably, would have three eyes.
Anyway, I digress. After the lighting meeting I went to see a projector demonstration - not something for the U2 tour but an interesting new gizmo which I wanted to go and have a look at for future reference. This was followed by a video meeting, and then another video meeting. The tour is still three months away, but a great many decisions now need to be made every single day, it seems.
Tune-de-jour at Letterman was 'I'll Go Crazy If I Don't Go Crazy Tonight', getting its first airing. Tim and his lighting team had really pushed the boat out, creating an interesting and (for a TV chat show) highly radical look for the song. This was a good demonstration of something that David Letterman said on air, during the show; 'Having U2 here is like a shot of electricity to the whole place - they just make everybody better.' Generous words indeed. When you're right in the thick of it, it's easy to forget just how hard this band strives to make everything the best it can be and that kind of energy tends to spread.
There's a huge amount to do just now, both for future promo appearances and for the real tour. I was hoping to sneak home at the weekend, but a U2 radio appearance in Boston next Wednesday just turned into a film shoot, so I'm going to have to stay on and get involved. Here we are. Trapped in Paradise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom