fly so high!
Refugee
Party Boy said:
Even if its 8 months 30 days old?
I would LOVE to find out where you guys get your info!
Party Boy said:
Even if its 8 months 30 days old?
Party Boy said:
All of the above. To me, they prevent the possibility of life. Abortion is ending life that already exists.
Please tell me if you cannot see the difference and I will try to explain.
martha said:
Wow. Congratulations. You've let us all know how you really feel.
fly so high! said:
I would LOVE to find out where you guys get your info!
fly so high! said:
So what is your answer to my question first and i will DO the honour of educating YOU!
fly so high! said:
So what is your answer to my question first and i will DO the honour of educating YOU!
Party Boy said:
If you read my original post, I have no interest in womens bodies. My arguement is the rights of the unborn child.
fly so high! said:
Wait a minute, i just re-read your post. You answered All of the above to the list of contraception methods.
And you happen to be a Pro-Lifer!.....ummm...interesting......
you don't consider The Pill or morning-after NOT Abortifacient...'cause reality is, it certainly is, it's just that the termination of pregnancy happens straight away or within a 72 hour period.
anitram said:
I know you're a man so you probably have no idea just how frightening that sounds to me as a woman and I can tell you I ain't the only one, not by far.
Party Boy said:
Let me clarify..
I am pro - life where life exists. How can i be pro - life if no life exists, other than the potential? I am aborting potential.
Sure, the morning after pill could be aborting existing life. I am not arguing this. However, we dont know this for a fact, so this for me is potential life as we are not consious of life existing.
fly so high! said:
So..... what, you DON'T think your little swimmers or your GF eggs are not LIFE!
Party Boy said:
Can I just clarify this sentence before I get jumped on by tons of people.
What i meant to say was who is the voice for the unborn child. Thats all. I didnt mean it to come out as harsh as it looks - i.e. women have zero rights and its all about the unborn child.
Apologies.
anitram said:
Thanks for the clarification!
But I would argue that we have MORE than enough "voices" for the unborn child. They are everywhere, they are often hysterical, they are pharmacists who won't issue me out pill that my MD prescribed, they have powerful lobbies, and so on.
The unborn have louder voices than the children who are abandoned into the foster care system, louder voices than the women so desperate that they feel they have no choice, louder voices than the women in the third world who have no access to birth control at all and so on.
Party Boy said:
I dont need to think about what I say or believe in.
Party Boy said:
I dont need to think about what I say or believe in.
Party Boy said:
If you read my original post, I have no interest in womens bodies.
Dreadsox said:
Why do the regulars sit by when stereotypes would not be tolorated of liberals.......and watch when people stereotype pro-lifers?
BonoVoxSupastar said:
This seems to be a running theme in FYM lately. Why is that? Are we getting lazy, or ignorant?
Then I guess you'll never have to worry about getting a girl pregnant.
Party Boy said:
If you read all the posts I sent folling that statement, you will see that i clarified it.
Party Boy said:
As for your last sentence, I have no idea what your talking about what that has to do with anything
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Maybe you think you did.
It was a joke, hense the wink. If you have no interest in women's bodies you wouldn't sleep with them therefore wouldn't have to worry about getting them pregnant...
Party Boy said:
I am assuming this is a joke also?
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Party Boy said:
Just as I thought
I am assuming this is a joke also?
BonoVoxSupastar said:
What? The was there because I have no clue as to what you are talking about.
I explained to you that my original comment was a joke, and you respond with
I mean what the hell does that mean?
You make no sense.