US Politics XXVIII: But His Laptop From Hell

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Really, tho, it’s unpacking the courts. Because McConnell and Co have been packing them for years.

Might makes right. That’s how it goes now.
 
Also, while we're continuing to rant about things, if the Democrats win, can there be a new law/regulation/whatever that bans politicians from firing guns in their political ads? 'Cause there's one for this asshole Jason Lewis who's running up in Minnesota (seriously, if you aren't familiar with him, read up, he's a real piece of work), and his wife's in it with him, and he's going on about how he'll protect the police and people's Second Amendment rights and blah, blah, blah.

And then at the end he's firing a gun as a way to prove how determined he is to defend that stuff. It's obnoxious as hell and if I have to see it one more time I'm going to throw something at my screen. At this point I just mute the TV whenever it comes on. It just screams threatening, and given we're in a time when we've got people actively plotting to kidnap governors and whatnot, the last thing we need is some jackass firing guns in their political ads to show how "tough" they are.

ETA:; Found the ad, here it is:

https://twitter.com/LewisForMN/status/1319125528276881408
 
Last edited:
So I'm hearing that Dems that have been working on the ground in TX are saying that their target for voter turnout is getting as near to 12 million as possible, and they think that is the magic number to flip the state blue. Right now, they stand at 7.8 million, so it will be a long haul to get near 12 million. But I believe there are still about 56% or more of registered voters that can still cast a ballot.
 
Good polling so far this morning

Civiqs
GA - Biden +5
PA - Biden +7

FL Atlantic
FL - Biden +2

UNLV Business
NV - Biden +9
 
I really want to see PA get to at least +6 by next Tuesday.

I think we are already there. There actually has been an upward trend for PA over the last 5 days. Back on the 15th to the 20th, you were seeing a lot of +3's and +5's. Over the last week, taking A and B rated pollsters, the average is +7.
 
I think we are already there. There actually has been an upward trend for PA over the last 5 days. Back on the 15th to the 20th, you were seeing a lot of +3's and +5's. Over the last week, taking A and B rated pollsters, the average is +7.

I trust the 538 polling average more on this because they avoid arbitrary criteria for adding or excluding polls, and they show some tightening of the PA race still.

Screen Shot 2020-10-27 at 10.46.12 AM.png
 
I trust the 538 polling average more on this because they avoid arbitrary criteria for adding or excluding polls, and they show some tightening of the PA race still.

View attachment 12665

oh yeah, me too. I'm using 538. My point was that the average is still being pulled down by some poorer polling a week or two ago. Recent polls (post debate) seem to be settling right around +7.
So I guess Biden's monumental blunder of talking about transitioning from fossil fuels really hurt him in PA. :lol:

I also really like The Economist. I think that G Elliott Morris is an even better analyst than Nate Silver. He has quite a few issues with how 538 does their calculations. So I like to look at both and sort of see how they agree and differ. Right now, they have PA at +6.8. That's closer to what i think the real number is. But we will see. Here's the link to Economists PA page.

https://projects.economist.com/us-2020-forecast/president/pennsylvania


But yes, i agree it would be great to see the overall average tick up over the week.

Today is last day of early voting in PA, so after today... we just have to wait and see what happens on Election Day.
 
His polling found Trump w/tiny leads in both states

Bloomberg's internal polling is impeccable so if he sees that TX and OH are within reach, I believe it.

A lot of people shat on him for not spending more $ but frankly he's a shrewd businessman and I 100% believe that his internal polling outfit which he built by poaching from the best has this in the bag for Biden. Why throw $ if/when not needed - he didn't become filthy rich by doing so.

These last minute buys could be crucial. He can afford to spend even more $, should do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom