Clearly. I have a Sanders voodoo doll that I sleep withWhat? You’re not
Clearly. I have a Sanders voodoo doll that I sleep withWhat? You’re not
Greed. Hatred. Delusion.
.
Clearly. I have a Sanders voodoo doll that I sleep with
It's inevitable. People will rally around the government in times of crisis.https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1243509432748781569?s=21
How? Are people really not believing this is going to be catastrophic? That it’s only a NYC issue like 9/11?
The rust belt and the south are a week or two away from becoming a disaster. I’m in CA but I’m not even sure if we’re testing at a good clip.
Guess once the real America starts dying it’ll become an issue
Yeah folks will take comfort in him telling them that we're going to beat this thing etc.
Approval will go up, but like Headache said his approval hasn't jumped a tremendous amount. If (when) things aren't all back to normal by Easter, his ratings will start to slip again.
Lol, unbelievable
Trump is threatening to take away licenses from television stations if they air an ad that is critical of his response to the coronavirus.
Via Bloomberg:
The Trump re-election campaign told TV stations they could lose their operating licenses for airing an ad criticizing the president’s actions in the coronavirus crisis — a challenge that may be more bluster than actual threat.
…..
Failure to remove the ad “could put your station’s license in jeopardy” before the Federal Communications Commission, the campaign said in the letter. “Your station has an obligation to cease and desist from airing it immediately to comply with FCC licensing requirements.”
There are a couple of huge problems with the Trump campaign’s threat. First, the President doesn’t have the power to take licenses away from television stations. Second, the ad is free speech. It is criticism of the government that is protected by the Constitution. If Trump tried to take a license away from a broadcaster for airing the ad, the issue would go to court, Trump would lose.
It is not surprising that after years of attacks on the free press, the Trump campaign would threaten the license of any station that airs criticism of him. However, the campaign’s over the top reaction reveals that they are sensitive to the criticism of Trump’s response, and it is up to the critics of this administration to loudly and repeatedly tell the truth about how Trump made America the world leader in coronavirus.
and just listen to all the outrage over this coming from "muh freeze peach" crowd right now...
Lol, unbelievable
Trump is threatening to take away licenses from television stations if they air an ad that is critical of his response to the coronavirus.
Via Bloomberg:
The Trump re-election campaign told TV stations they could lose their operating licenses for airing an ad criticizing the president’s actions in the coronavirus crisis — a challenge that may be more bluster than actual threat.
…..
Failure to remove the ad “could put your station’s license in jeopardy” before the Federal Communications Commission, the campaign said in the letter. “Your station has an obligation to cease and desist from airing it immediately to comply with FCC licensing requirements.”
There are a couple of huge problems with the Trump campaign’s threat. First, the President doesn’t have the power to take licenses away from television stations. Second, the ad is free speech. It is criticism of the government that is protected by the Constitution. If Trump tried to take a license away from a broadcaster for airing the ad, the issue would go to court, Trump would lose.
It is not surprising that after years of attacks on the free press, the Trump campaign would threaten the license of any station that airs criticism of him. However, the campaign’s over the top reaction reveals that they are sensitive to the criticism of Trump’s response, and it is up to the critics of this administration to loudly and repeatedly tell the truth about how Trump made America the world leader in coronavirus.
Not sure that’s the way it works. We aren’t “borrowing” from the government. They’re borrowing from us.
You do realize that “canceling student loan debt” just changes who pays for it, right? It’s never really cancelled.
So you have a six figure income, at least partly based on the student loans you took out, but now think that taxpayers, i. e. other people, should have to pay for it.
I don’t think I should have to pay for your student loans, I’m sorry.
You do realize that it’s already paid for, right? Like, my loans were disbursed three years ago.
So, gzus, if the loans are already paid for, do you have any further objections?
I don't understand.
I don't understand.
Yeah these responses were so stupid, I just let it lie.
Those two responses speak volumes. If they’re already “paid “, then who are you paying back?
Math and Economics are hard around here, oh, and logical thought.
oh, and logical thought.
Yeah these responses were so stupid, I just let it lie.
Those two responses speak volumes. If they’re already “paid “, then who are you paying back?
Math and Economics are hard around here, oh, and logical thought.
Seriously, those who do nothing more than make the occasional drive by post full of multiple falsehoods and snide remarks, and who run away from engaging in any sort of thoughtful debate, are about the last people I want to hear mocking anyone else here.