I addressed it.So entertaining. Same can be be said of what does NPR think of it? What does Rachel Maddow think of it? What does CNN think of it?
Or, you could address the actual topic.
You ignored it.
I addressed it.So entertaining. Same can be be said of what does NPR think of it? What does Rachel Maddow think of it? What does CNN think of it?
Or, you could address the actual topic.
The KKK considered themselves a Christian organization.Anyone who is in a position of leadership, and wants to force their views on others , and take rights away is a fascist.
AOC, and unfortunately many others (including people on this forum) want to restrict freedom of speech (fascism) , support violence in response to views (real or imagined) that they don’t like, force people into giving up their religious freedoms and calling it hate , is fascism. Faking hate crimes, and fake photo ops to push leftist propaganda is fascism.
AOC is just the latest leftist tool being used and drooled over by the left. The fact that you guys are more obsessed with what I say, versus deciding which millionaire hypocrite you guys will prop up (or the DNC rigs the primary for) between Biden , Warren, or Sanders , is very telling.
I don’t get it... he missed the mark but y’all made a whole thread to speak in tongue to each other. These aren’t relatable tit for tats.
Well you can take the time to explain.
Indeed, and yet it would likely fall on deaf ears. Such a pity...
Indeed, and yet it would likely fall on deaf ears. Such a pity...
I don’t get it... he missed the mark but y’all made a whole thread to speak in tongue to each other. These aren’t relatable tit for tats.
Awww... you're equating me being wrong about Trump losing the election to you being a racist piece of shit. That's cute.like a black fly in your Chardonnay
http://www.u2interference.com/forum...ion-thread-part-xv-220364-15.html#post8113854
Indeed, and yet it would likely fall on deaf ears. Such a pity...
I would prefer if a supporter of the president answers this post and not someone who would echo my absurd sentiments:
Is Donald Trump fit to be talking about hurricanes if he’s “never heard” of a category 5 hurricane? Maybe he doesn’t know. Let’s suppose. If this is the case, do you believe that he should be saying that this is the worst hurricane ever, and that there’s never been such a thing as a category 5?
Or is it that he’s actually not stupid and is intentionally undermining Hurricane Katrina because of the association of people on the left blaming people on the right for a lack of response to the most well known category 5 hurricane in the United States? Or AT LEAST he is intentionally doing this to anger people who do not like him.
He’s not that stupid. Please explain to me why it is appropriate for the President of the United States to intentionally speak non-factually to anger or troll people who do not support him. Is this appropriate?
Please respond.
He didn’t do anything illegal.
Everyone needs to put this sensational story to bed. The only story here might be that he’s an immature high school boy who wants to show off America’s dick. What’s new?
Not the first time Trump said he's never heard of a Category 5
Trump has previously indicated several other times that Category 5 hurricanes are unprecedented weather events that either he or others had never heard of or witnessed.
In the days between the landfalls of Hurricane Irma and Maria, he said he "never even knew" they existed and said days later that "people (in Puerto Rico) had never seen anything like" the storm.
In October 2017, Trump claimed "nobody has ever heard of a (Category) 5 hitting land," and earlier this year, he again said he had never heard of a hurricane of that intensity.
While the US has seen a number of Category 5 storms in recent memory -- including Hurricane Katrina in 2005 -- scientists estimate that Atlantic hurricanes could become more common in the coming years. And while researchers can't definitively say the climate crisis is leading to more intense hurricanes, scientists have found that rising sea levels due to global warming can further exacerbate the impact of Atlantic hurricanes.
It's not a question if it was illegal, to me, but the simple fact of how huge of a negative implication it is that he did share it, even if he declassified it in order to do so.
Also,
I’m not sure it did have a huge negative impact. Nations know when they’re being watched and by who and by what. Publicly available information.
The latter bit about the hurricane thing makes me go back and forth on whether or not he’s an idiot or a troll. It’s got to be both.
Can’t claim people want to end your free speech if your MO is quite literally that you’re not going to talk because people disagree with you.
Awww... you're equating me being wrong about Trump losing the election to you being a racist piece of shit. That's cute.
such a coward.
I would prefer if a supporter of the president answers this post and not someone who would echo my absurd sentiments:
Is Donald Trump fit to be talking about hurricanes if he’s “never heard” of a category 5 hurricane? Maybe he doesn’t know. Let’s suppose. If this is the case, do you believe that he should be saying that this is the worst hurricane ever, and that there’s never been such a thing as a category 5?
Or is it that he’s actually not stupid and is intentionally undermining Hurricane Katrina because of the association of people on the left blaming people on the right for a lack of response to the most well known category 5 hurricane in the United States? Or AT LEAST he is intentionally doing this to anger people who do not like him.
He’s not that stupid. Please explain to me why it is appropriate for the President of the United States to intentionally speak non-factually to anger or troll people who do not support him. Is this appropriate?
Please respond.
You attempting to argue any moral high ground is what’s really laughable here.
You pretending to be a moderator is actual LOL stand up comedy.
Go ahead and sit on your thumbs while the enraged keyboard warrior calls me a racist, well done