US Politics II

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I just gave you two examples. And you know what is funny - I've posted a few things for the time in years - and the amount of insults haven't changed. Why can't we have a debate without the personal "at my avatar"attacks? Many of you have made some great points in the past - but they are much more easily received when I don't have to sift through the old cliche eye rolls, stop reading (insert obvious Right Wing website). I am only here to engage in a discussion, because I like healthy debates about the hot issues of the day. I will often play devil's advocate because there are so few opposing views here. But those opposing views do exist and you cannot just "insult" them away. You will need to win the debate.



but the Left isn't interested in debate. didn't you read the other thread?
 
Lol I'm not arguing reality, I'm laughing at selective perception.

You know, saying someone isn't a nazi because they aren't socialist. Sort of ignores the whole social belief that everyone knows of nazis.

If not an actual Nazi (meaning a member of some sort of new-Nazi political party. They exist, just have very few members) - what makes a person a Nazi in your eyes? Racism? If so - can black people be Nazis if they are also racist? Or someone who is Jewish who says, Goyim? Are they Nazis? Are only white racist Nazis? If so, what is uniquely bad about white racism (versus the racism of other races)?
 
Bad ideas will simple fade out if you let them. It is only when we use violence (or the law) to prohibit free speech, do we extend the life of bad ideas.


1920s and 1930s Germany shows this isn't true.
 
Well, I just gave you two examples. And you know what is funny - I've posted a few things for the time in years - and the amount of insults haven't changed. Why can't we have a debate without the personal "at my avatar"attacks? Many of you have made some great points in the past - but they are much more easily received when I don't have to sift through the old cliche eye rolls, stop reading (insert obvious Right Wing website). I am only here to engage in a discussion, because I like healthy debates about the hot issues of the day. I will often play devil's advocate because there are so few opposing views here. But those opposing views do exist and you cannot just "insult" them away. You will need to win the debate.



So far you've lied, ignored, twisted people's responses, and showed sympathy for Nazis.

That's how you engage in debate?
 
The OP who posts and runs and never ever engages in discussion was proven right?
 
If not an actual Nazi (meaning a member of some sort of new-Nazi political party. They exist, just have very few members) - what makes a person a Nazi in your eyes? Racism? If so - can black people be Nazis if they are also racist? Or someone who is Jewish who says, Goyim? Are they Nazis? Are only white racist Nazis? If so, what is uniquely bad about white racism (versus the racism of other races)?



This is debate? You don't know how to identify a nazi?
 
but the Left isn't interested in debate. didn't you read the other thread?



Precisely.

TBH orange Donnie is the problem. Half of the viewpoints, while still incredibly offensive, are being spewed out in a way such that there is no moral, logical, or otherwise sane thought process in which their being conveyed. If it was just a regular politician defending his views, I'm sure there would be more dialogue (sadly).

What I don't understand is how folks can blindly follow that man and accept whatever he says as their position. Look no further than Afghanistan and NK. He talks a big game about being anti-imperialist. About not being the world's police. About not being in foreign countries. All fantastic things! And yet he's egging on North Korea. He has a "plan" (he probably found in a fortune cookie) to fight harder in Afghanistan. He blindly threatens Venezuela. He has literally done everything he can to continue being the world's police, being imperialist, and being present in foreign countries. And yet his people still defend him! They wake up and say "well, his plan is better than before." On what grounds?!? On what grounds, I ask. I won't get an answer, though. Because at the end of the day, as long as it != Obama, it's right. If democrats invented a cure for AIDS, Trump would have it undone by next week.
 
Lol I'm not arguing reality, I'm laughing at selective perception.

You know, saying someone isn't a nazi because they aren't socialist. Sort of ignores the whole social belief that everyone knows of nazis.

yeah i figured you would be aware of that, but just thought it needed pointing out anyway haha
 
1920s and 1930s Germany shows this isn't true.
Wasn't Hitler jailed? Didn't Hitler use the negative press against him to "prove" that the Jews were against him? Didn't the Nazis go so far as to stage violence against their parades because they knew it would help their cause in the long run?

Then again - I hope you are applying the same standard to other "identity-based" groups.
 
If not an actual Nazi (meaning a member of some sort of new-Nazi political party. They exist, just have very few members) - what makes a person a Nazi in your eyes? Racism? If so - can black people be Nazis if they are also racist? Or someone who is Jewish who says, Goyim? Are they Nazis? Are only white racist Nazis? If so, what is uniquely bad about white racism (versus the racism of other races)?

oh jesus please go back to school or read a book or something
 
The OP who posts and runs and never ever engages in discussion was proven right?
Yeah - try to read the thread again. In essence it breaks down like this:

Right says, "Man, you just can't debate with the Left..."

Left says, "O sure you can, you just can't say anything I disagree with, because everything you think is repugnant"

Left locks thread...

C'mon - that's funny! You guys proved his point for him...
 
Wasn't Hitler jailed? Didn't Hitler use the negative press against him to "prove" that the Jews were against him? Didn't the Nazis go so far as to stage violence against their parades because they knew it would help their cause in the long run?



Then again - I hope you are applying the same standard to other "identity-based" groups.



Just stop. This isn't honest debate, and you know it.

You're not even making sense first of all with these examples. Secondly NONE of these groups you're trying to equate want to eradicate a race.

Just stop, if you're serious about debating then do that, but what you're doing now is childish.
 
I have no problem with a counter protest. I take issue (and so does the law) when they attack (smash people and burn property). Also - NAZI means "National Socialism" - are you suggesting the marchers, or Trump, are supporting National Socialism?

Are you suggesting that buffalo wings aren't made from buffalos?
 
Yeah - try to read the thread again. In essence it breaks down like this:



Right says, "Man, you just can't debate with the Left..."



Left says, "O sure you can, you just can't say anything I disagree with, because everything you think is repugnant"



Left locks thread...



C'mon - that's funny! You guys proved his point for him...



Once again you're lying.

Where did anyone say, you can't say anything I disagree with?

That thread was the equivalent of Keith Richards walking in, saying "don't do drugs", lighting up a crack pipe and walking away never to be seen again.
 
Guess Bernie Sanders is a NAZI

This is why we cannot debate in here

antifa is ISIS, right down to the way they dress, and tearing down statues (like ISIS)

I'll wait for antifa to start chopping heads off, demand we all convert to ??? some belief system, and run people over in cars

Oh wait, that was a neo nazi who did that last part. And tried to justify the murder of an innocent woman by stating you saw the video and didn't think the car was doing anything wrong? Or that people were instigating him to run them over?

This is why nothing will ever get resolved. It's all the fucking extremes.

I am hesitant of antifa because of their use of violence in our society. When I see someone getting punched in the face in Germany for giving the salute, I laugh and think good....because of the history there.

We have different laws here so I'm trying to balance my emotions within them.

I am willing to state that if our laws allow neo nazis, and other hate groups, who want nothing more than to cause violence to a specific group of people/race, march and try to intimidate towns/cities of their eventual takeover, then maybe the law needs to be changed.

It's not worth it anymore, unless we're willing to fight over it again.
 
Once again you're lying.

Where did anyone say, you can't say anything I disagree with?

That thread was the equivalent of Keith Richards walking in, saying "don't do drugs", lighting up a crack pipe and walking away never to be seen again.

Okay then - starting with my first post in this thread - count the number of personal insults against me vs the number of personal insults I've made against others.

Has this become a Left only forum?
 
Okay then - starting with my first post in this thread - count the number of personal insults against me vs the number of personal insults I've made against others.



Has this become a Left only forum?



This is a complete non sequitur. Insults or not, you lied about the thread.
 
If not an actual Nazi (meaning a member of some sort of new-Nazi political party. They exist, just have very few members) - what makes a person a Nazi in your eyes? Racism? If so - can black people be Nazis if they are also racist? Or someone who is Jewish who says, Goyim? Are they Nazis? Are only white racist Nazis? If so, what is uniquely bad about white racism (versus the racism of other races)?
I'd say the guys waiving swastikas and shouting blood and soil would be Nazis, and those who have no issue wth the guys waving swastikas and shouting blood and soil are Nazi sympathizers. Which is kinda like being Nazi Lite.
 
Okay then - starting with my first post in this thread - count the number of personal insults against me vs the number of personal insults I've made against others.

Has this become a Left only forum?
You've yet to respond to my actual examples of Donald Trump being racist.

Just kinda skipped right over that one, d'ntcha?
 
It has always been a forum that has a hard time listening to people sympathize with the plight of racists and/or white supremacists.

Or those support (supported) traditional marriage, enforcement of immigration laws, against Obamacare, favor moderate gun control, oppose late term abortion...

The current discussion about these protests is just another example of this forum's intolerance. Is it really that much fun to post something and everyone agree with you? I think that's boring....
 
You've yet to respond to my actual examples of Donald Trump being racist.

Just kinda skipped right over that one, d'ntcha?
I thought I did , I don't think those are examples of racism any more than you could pull ANY random politician and claim racism. George Wallace and the other Democrats of the past - yes, overt racism. Those examples you posted are not examples of racism - they are too vague.
 
Or those support (supported) traditional marriage, enforcement of immigration laws, against Obamacare, favor moderate gun control, oppose late term abortion...



The current discussion about these protests is just another example of this forum's intolerance. Is it really that much fun to post something and everyone agree with you? I think that's boring....



The problem is, your posts come off completely disingenuous. Like you wanted to come in sympathize with some Nazis and get everyone's feathers ruffled.

I mean they call themselves Nazis, have swastika tattoos and you're questioning the definition of Nazi? You're not that dumb. I know you're not. I just don't find you to be honest. You can try and spin this all you want, but it's pretty transparent.

I walk in, say something stupid, then play victim of "the left". It gets old.

If you were honest and wanted to come in and discuss something seriously, things would be different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom