These last few pages...holy...
If people want the right to burn the American flag, then they have to accept the rights of those who want to wave a Confederate flag (or rainbow flag, or hammer and sickle flag...etc).
Yes, because the Confederate flag is totally the same thing as waving a rainbow flag or an American flag
.
It is really only possible to discuss the qualities of another based on their words or actions. We shouldn't pretend we can read people's minds and just assume racism. Additionally, let's say his private thoughts ARE racist? So what? Are we now the thought police?
People are free to think what they want. It is only in their words and their actions can we truly assess them (and even that is limited).
And Headache posted an article describing his racist actions a number of pages back. I also noted his hiring people for his administration that are racist and xenophobic. Why hire them if he doesn't plan to use them to help carry out his views?
Here's the thing, generally, people who hold those kinds of racist and xenophobic views do not stop at
just believing that stuff. It always comes through in their actions as well. My grandma, for instance, spouted racist beliefs, and she backed them up by closing the curtains when my dad brought home a black friend from school once, so that none of the neighbors would see.
Nazis and white nationalists tend to have a big history of committing violence. The guy who rammed his car into the crowd in Charlottesville also had a history of domestic violence. They're not content to just spout their views, they want to make them a reality. There's a reason they're often armed with a boatload of guns, after all.
Many people were insinuating Obama wasn't born in the US. Hillary Clinton was one of them - is she also racist?
Ah, yes, that old nonsense rumor. That's been proven to be completely false. So try again.
True - BLM is far more violent and has been given a virtual free-pass from the press and the last Administration.
Nope. Try again.
President Bill Clinton proposed such a wall to a standing ovation from congress, is he a racist?
I would need to see Clinton's stance on the issue, 'cause I have no memory of that.
I read it and literally laughed out loud when I saw it was locked. Thus proving the OPs point...
It got locked because the particular poster who started the thread has a history of posting controversial things and up and leaving without continuing the conversation, and engaging other posters in honest debate. Not because of the political views in and of themselves. If that poster actually wanted to try engaging in a proper debate for once, we'd be all for it.
No, my point was this place hasn't been "friendly" to any Conservative POV. Eventually - the Conservatives leave because it simply gets annoying.
From what I've seen of some of the recent conservatives who've left, they left because they turned into nothing but trolls who responded to debates with stupid memes and saying ridiculous things to intentionally try and rile people up, instead of actually trying to have a mature conversation. One of the recent conservatives who hung around here was outed as a white nationalist after being kicked out for trolling behavior.
I loved having conservatives like nbcrusader and 80sU2isBest here, because they actually participated in the debates and treated people with respect. Sadly, we're not getting that with many of the conservatives who've come here in recent times.
Add in the fact that people are entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts, so when people come here and keep spouting things that are demonstrably untrue, after a while, people get tired of having to put up with that. Knowingly spreading ignorant and misinformed views can be very dangerous.