phillyfan26
Blue Crack Supplier
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 30,343
Continue.
diamond said:Obama is a man compared to Edwards and on par with Mitt.
diamond said:Edwards is an empty suit, with phonier charisma then Mitt.
Obama is a man compared to Edwards and on par with Mitt.
Edwards is a child.
dbs
diamond said:Edwards is an empty suit, with phonier charisma then Mitt.
Obama is a man compared to Edwards and on par with Mitt.
Edwards is a child.
dbs
Irvine511 said:[q]Would I want Hillary answering the red phone in the middle of the night? No, bloody not. The White House first responder should be a person of steady, consistent character and mood -- which describes Obama more than Hillary. And that scare ad was produced with amazing ineptitude. If it's 3 a.m., why is the male-seeming mother fully dressed as she comes in to check on her sleeping children? Is she a bar crawler or insomniac? An obsessive-compulsive housecleaner, like Joan Crawford in "Mommie Dearest"? And why is Hillary sitting at her desk in full drag and jewelry at that ungodly hour? A president should not be a monomaniac incapable of rest and perched on guard all night like Poe's baleful raven. People at the top need a relaxed perspective, which gives judgment and balance. Workaholism is an introspection-killing disease, the anxious disability of tunnel-vision middle managers.[/q]
oh, Professor Paglia!
diamond said:Edwards is an empty suit, with phonier charisma then Mitt.
Obama is a man compared to Edwards and on par with Mitt.
Edwards is a child.
dbs
BonoVoxSupastar said:"This why McCain will be our next President kids.
Mark my words.
3/12/2007
diamondbrunothetruth."
You hated this guy just a few weeks ago, I understand supporting your side, but voting for someone who you spoke so ill of... I will never understand.
anitram said:I wanted to comment on deep's assertion that Edwards offered the same things as Obama, if not much more.
That's just patently false. I liked Edwards, but their platforms are NOT the same. Their healthcare plans were vastly different. Furthermore, Obama is a much more corporate candidate than Edwards ever was (regardless of how he's been raising his money). I know plenty of people who vote Dem who do not think that Edwards' populist views are viable, and as a Canadian, honestly he reminded me of the NDP in a lot of ways. Don't get me wrong, that's not a bad thing, but it also has practical implications regarding what bills can actually be passed.
So I have no idea how Edwards offered a much better plan for the same things. He didn't; they were fundamentally different candidates with different priorities.
verte76 said:
I don't want McCain to be our next President! I'll be so pissed off if he gets elected!
verte76 said:
Obama is a corporate candidate?
verte76 said:I just got an email from the Obama campaign that Ferraro resigned from Hillary's campaign. Has anyone else heard this?
Dear Hillary -
I am stepping down from your finance committee so I can speak for myself and you can continue to speak for yourself about what is at stake in this campaign.
The Obama campaign is attacking me to hurt you.
I won't let that happen.
Thank you for everything you have done and continue to do to make this a better world for my children and grandchildren.
You have my deep admiration and respect.
Gerry
Irvine511 said:should we remind Ms. Ferraro that the #1 beneficiaries of affirmative action have always, always been women?
"I started off by saying, if you go back to 1984 and look at my historic candidacy, which I had just talked about all these things, in 1984 if my name was Gerard Ferraro instead of Geraldine Ferraro, I would have never been chosen as a vice presidential candidate," Ferraro said." "It had nothing to do with my qualification."
deep said:
why ?
it is how she began this dialog
Vincent Vega said:A severe lack of self-confidence, isn't it?
Irvine511 said:i'm still puzzled by her comments --