Unborn babies carry pollutants, study finds

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
You've made your point, already.

And just to reiterate mine:

4I'mSorry%20note.jpg
 
Okay, the apology has been made...now...let's continue on with the topic.

Basically, if you want to keep this thread going, respond with replies pertaining to the initial post of this thread. The other stuff that has gone on in this thread really doesn't need to be discussed any further.
 
ewen said:
unbelieavable

you got away with it

EWEN...

What part of my posts don't you understand? That's enough!

As I said in another thread too...

http://forum.interference.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=2667721#post2667721

...all reprimands, warnings, etc., are not necessarily made in public. You don't know what mods do through email and PM. The mods will deal with people who behave inappropriately.

NOW...

I'm gonna ask ONE MORE TIME for this thread to go on track.
 
If people want to compare dead babys ( ore handycapt babies ) by polution with abortion,.i am puzzeled also . :|
 
MaxFisher said:
Pollutants harming unborn babies = bad

Aborting unborn babies = perfectly legal

:scratch:

I'm surprised it took this long for someone to say this.:|

If Republicans care so much for the unborn maybe now they have incentive to actually do something about the environment which they've consistently ignore year after year.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:

If Republicans care so much for the unborn maybe now they have incentive to actually do something about the environment which they've consistently ignore year after year.

:up:
 
How do they carry pollutants?

I'm sorry, I'm too lazy to read anything over 50 words long. :|
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom