I guess it's some sort of weird psychological phenomenon to believe that wherever you live is immune to this sort of reaction. Interesting. Batteries and wires were visible, not a Lite Brite-but I guess people just want to ignore that and all the other facts
By Mac Daniel, Globe Staff | February 2, 2007
In six of the nine other cities where the Turner Broadcasting System guerrilla ads were installed, they were not placed on or near major highways, bridges, or transit hubs, as they were in Boston.
Law enforcement officials in other cities and in Boston said yesterday that the difference helps to explain the vastly different responses. While no one had reported the magnetic lighted signs as suspicious in the other cities, they caused a bomb scare that paralyzed parts of the Boston region for much of Wednesday.
"I think Boston reacted the way they did because someone noticed the devices and rightly thought that they might be dangerous," Atlanta Police spokesman Joe Cobb said in a telephone interview. "I would think that we would have reacted similarly."
Turner Broadcasting hired a New York City marketing company to promote a show on the Cartoon Network with the lighted signs depicted one of the show's characters. That company, Interference Inc., then hired freelance workers in 10 cities to place the signs over the last few weeks in areas where young men would see them. After news of the Boston bomb scare, Turner Broadcasting gave police in the other cities lists of where the signs were placed, so they could retrieve them to prevent further scares.
Cobb said the company supplied a list of 52 intended and 10 actual locations of the signs in Atlanta. But when police canvassed those areas Wednesday night, no signs were recovered, he said. Cobb said the only one that could have caused concern because of its location was on a bridge overpass, but police received no calls about it.
"They were predominantly in trendy or alternative areas of the city, on vacant buildings near bars," he said. "Other than what happened in Boston, we were kind of oblivious to the whole thing."
The New York Police Department was given a list of 41 possible locations for the signs, but only found two in Manhattan, both 20 feet off the ground on an unused railroad overpass. Spokesman John Kelly said the department had received no complaints or 911 calls about the devices. It is not clear what happened to the other 39, he said.
Austin police spokeswoman Toni Chovanetz said none of the signs were on bridges, major intersections, roads, or bus stations. When officers went to retrieve the signs, all were gone. So, too, in Los Angeles, where police yesterday would not comment yesterday.
In Portland, San Francisco, and Seattle, police said they were not collecting the devices.
In Seattle, the first device was found Tuesday by a public works crew working on a railroad trestle, Woodinville Police Chief John McSwain told the Associated Press.
"Public works found it and took it down and didn't even bother to call us," because the device didn't appear to be threatening, he said.
The two cities that were reacting were Philadelphia and Chicago, where, as in Boston, some of the signs were located near rail stations, officials said.
In Chicago, police recovered 20 of the signs from at least 34 locations cited by Turner Broadcasting, including near elevated train platforms.
As police canvassed the city, they spotted two men removing the signs at one location. Both were questioned and admitted working for Interference, but were not arrested.
"Just by the appearance of the wires and the lights, it's enough to alarm someone into thinking that it could possibly be an explosive device," said Chicago police spokeswoman Monique Bond, who said police did not get any calls.
In Philadelphia, where officials had only recovered one of 56 signs, one potential location was at 30th Street Station, the city's main rail hub. Another location was at a train stop. No devices were recovered from either location.
Joe Grace, spokesman for Mayor John F. Street, said the city of Philadelphia was never notified by Turner about the signs. He said the city sent a "cease and desist" letter to the corporation and could also impose fines. "It's one thing to do innovative or interesting marketing, and it's another thing to do something irresponsible, and this was irresponsible," said Grace.
Boston Police Commissioner Edward F. Davis said yesterday that the massive response was based partly on terrorism-related arrests earlier in the day in Britain; the shutdown of a Washington, D.C, subway station because of a suspicious package; and local reports of different kinds of suspicious devices.
There was a potential pipe bomb in a drawer on the second floor of New England Medical Center and an unknown cylindrical device near the Longfellow Bridge, he said.
"This incident unfolded in a rather unique way," he said. "There was the first incident at 9, and then after 1 p.m. there were a series of incidents and a flood of calls that came in that indicated that someone was putting these devices in places that affected rail transportation, bridges, and medical facilities."
According to a police report, Peter L. Berdovsky, one of two men charged in connection with installing the signs, told investigators that he was instructed by Interference to place the LED signs around "train stations, overpasses, hip and trendy areas, high traffic areas of high visibility."
Berdovsky told police that late Monday and early Tuesday he and the other man charged, Sean Stevens, put up 18 of the signs.
"A device affixed to a support beam for a highway adjacent to a very busy subway and bus hub for the T?" asked T general manager Daniel A. Grabauskas. "And then in short order we hear about something under the Longfellow Bridge, the main arterial link between Cambridge and Boston over which the Red Line runs? Any suspicious activity around those locations would raise attention."